IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rtv/ceisrp/292.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic effects of treatment of chronic kidney disease with low-protein diet

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Saverio Mennini

    (CEIS University of Rome "Tor Vergata")

  • Simone Russo

    (ISPESL)

  • Andrea Marcellusi

    (CEIS University of Rome "Tor Vergata")

  • Giuseppe Quintaliani

    (Departments of Nephrology Dialysis and Cardiology, Silvestrini Hospital, Perugia)

  • Denis Fouque

    (Dept Nephrology,Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Center for European Nutrition and Safety, Université de Lyon, France)

Abstract

Background: Several clinical studies have shown that a low protein diet in patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), delays the natural progression of the end stage renal disease (ESRD) and the necessary treatment of chronic dialysis. The aim of this study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of a low protein diet compared with no dietary treatment in patients with CKD stage 4 and 5 after 2, 3, 5 and 10 years. Methods: A Markov model was developed to estimate costs and QALYs associated with low protein diet versus no treatment for patients with CKD stage 4-5. The transition probability was estimated on data from seven studies which determined the efficacy of low protein diets in delaying the need to start maintenance dialysis. The Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) scores used were estimated with the Time Trade Off technique. The annual cost of dialysis per patient was estimated to be approximately €34,072. The costs of a low-protein diet was €1,440 per patient per year in the Lazio Region (conservative assumptions). Results: Treatment with a low-protein diet was more effective in terms of QALYs: the difference was always in favour of dietary treatment from a 0.09 QALYS after the first two years, 0.16 after three years, 0.36 after five years and up to a differential of 0.93 year after the first 10 years of treatment. In terms of cost-effectiveness, the dietary treatment was always dominant in all intervals considered. The dominance is due to the fact that the treatment is more effective in terms of QALYs and at the same time is less expensive. Conclusion: The results of these simulations indicate that the treatment of CKD patients with a low protein diet is cost effective relative to no-treatment in an Italian setting. Further studies should test this model in other countries with different dialysis costs and dietary support.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Saverio Mennini & Simone Russo & Andrea Marcellusi & Giuseppe Quintaliani & Denis Fouque, 2013. "Economic effects of treatment of chronic kidney disease with low-protein diet," CEIS Research Paper 292, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 10 Oct 2013.
  • Handle: RePEc:rtv:ceisrp:292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ceistorvergata.it/RePEc/rpaper/RP292.pdf
    File Function: Main text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Douglas K. Miller & Sharon M. Homan, 1994. "Determining Transition Probabilities," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 14(1), pages 52-58, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giuseppe Turchetti & S. Bellelli & M. Amato & S. Bianchi & P. Conti & A. Cupisti & V. Panichi & A. Rosati & F. Pizzarelli, 2017. "The social cost of chronic kidney disease in Italy," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 18(7), pages 847-858, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bruce A. Craig & Peter P. Sendi, 2002. "Estimation of the transition matrix of a discrete‐time Markov chain," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(1), pages 33-42, January.
    2. Thomas Hoffmann & Helmut Brunner, 2004. "Model for simulation of HIV/AIDS and cost-effectiveness of preventing non-tuberculous mycobacterial (MAC)-disease," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 5(2), pages 129-135, May.
    3. Jan Jürgensen & Robert Ikenberg & Roger-Axel Greiner & Volker Hösel, 2015. "Cost-effectiveness of modern mTOR inhibitor based immunosuppression compared to the standard of care after renal transplantation in Germany," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 16(4), pages 377-390, May.
    4. Rachael Fleurence & Christopher Hollenbeak, 2007. "Rates and Probabilities in Economic Modelling," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 3-6, January.
    5. K. Le Lay & E. Myon & S. Hill & L. Riou-Franca & D. Scott & M. Sidhu & D. Dunlop & R. Launois, 2007. "Comparative cost-minimisation of oral and intravenous chemotherapy for first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in the UK NHS system," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 8(2), pages 145-151, June.
    6. Lartey, Stella T. & Si, Lei & Otahal, Petr & de Graaff, Barbara & Boateng, Godfred O. & Biritwum, Richard Berko & Minicuci, Nadia & Kowal, Paul & Magnussen, Costan G. & Palmer, Andrew J., 2020. "Annual transition probabilities of overweight and obesity in older adults: Evidence from World Health Organization Study on global AGEing and adult health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    7. Nicola J. Cooper & Alex J. Sutton & Keith R. Abrams & David Turner & Allan Wailoo, 2004. "Comprehensive decision analytical modelling in economic evaluation: a Bayesian approach," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(3), pages 203-226, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rtv:ceisrp:292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Barbara Piazzi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csrotit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.