IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rsc/rsceui/2015-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Between a rock and a hard place: International market dynamics, domestic politics and Gazprom's strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Andrei V. Belyi
  • Andreas Goldthau

Abstract

Gazprom, Russian's prime state owned gas producer, is facing severe pressure stemming from international gas market dynamics, EU regulation and the Ukraine crisis. Slowing gas demand coupled with shifting pricing models and a persisting transit issue pose significant challenges for Gazprom's business going forward. Domestic pressure emerges from competition arising from private companies, mainly Notatek, but also state owned rival Rosneft, and is reinforced by governmental moves toward more market oriented Russian gas sector organization. Gazprom's options include pivoting to alternative markets, notably China; reverting to international legal bodies and market principles to counter EU regulatory pressures; and to depoliticize gas trade in order to generate long term expectations on its prime market - Europe. We pose that neither of these options is likely to fully solve Gazprom's dilemma, whose competitive position will arguably further weaken both domestically and internationally. We believe that Gazprom's best option would be to aim for depoliticizing gas trade, by way of giving up its de facto monopoly on gas exports to Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrei V. Belyi & Andreas Goldthau, 2015. "Between a rock and a hard place: International market dynamics, domestic politics and Gazprom's strategy," RSCAS Working Papers 2015/22, European University Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsc:rsceui:2015/22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/35398/RSCAS_2015_22.pdf?sequence=3
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1814/35398
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Energy security; gas markets; Gazprom; European Union; regulation;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsc:rsceui:2015/22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (RSCAS web unit). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/rsiueit.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.