IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Distorsiuni concurentiale si solutii optime: concentrari economice, abuz de pozitie dominanta, practici verticale si interventii ale statului


  • Prisecaru, Paul

    (Consiliului Concurentei)


In this paper, the best solutions available, in the author's opinion, to restore the competitive environment in the case of four competitive distortions, are selectively presented. First, two relatively recent case studies from US and EU, are presented. These cases, namely AT&T / T-Mobile (USA) and NYSE Euronext / Deutsche Börse (EU), are relevant for the latest approaches to measuring economic efficiency in relation to anti-competitive effects. Secondly, regarding the interaction between competition policy, namely abuse of dominant position, and intellectual property rights, the Magill and IMS Health, both EU cases, are summarized and a brief discussion of the European Commission's approach in Microsoft and Google cases is presented. Certainly, future developments in the abuse of dominant position are difficult to predict, but the intersection of competition law and intellectual property rights will generate further evolving jurisprudence. Thirdly, vertical restrictive practices (agreements between companies at different levels of the production and distribution chain) are approached from a new perspective, providing as a solution a decision matrix that combines both the American and European approaches. Finally, for evaluating and eliminating distortions of competition caused by public regulations, the paper describes the tools developed by the OECD and the relevant experience in applying these tools in other states. The OECD Checklist is currently the best instrument in the world for regulatory impact assessment, backed by outstanding practical results, particularly to Australia.

Suggested Citation

  • Prisecaru, Paul, 2015. "Distorsiuni concurentiale si solutii optime: concentrari economice, abuz de pozitie dominanta, practici verticale si interventii ale statului," Studii Economice 150924, National Institute of Economic Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:ror:seince:150924

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    mergers; efficiencies; abuse of dominant position; intellectual property rights; vertical restraints; resale price maintenance; regulatory impact assessment; competition toolkit;

    JEL classification:

    • K2 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law
    • L4 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ror:seince:150924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Corina Saman). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.