IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rnp/wpaper/051706.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Interaction of Unofficial Philosophy and the Scientific and Technical Community in the Late USSR: The Case of Obninsk
[Взаимодействие Неофициальной Философии И Научно-Технического Сообщества В Позднем Ссср: Случай Обнинска]

Author

Listed:
  • Khandozhko, Roman (Хандожко, Роман)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

Abstract

The paper deals with the formation of philosophical interest of Soviet physicists in the 1950-80's and the social forms of realization of this interest, such as friendship groups with informal leadership, the official network of methodological seminars and the movement of systemic methodology. On the example of the Moscow Methodological Circle author demonstrates how the political pressure on the intellectual community in the period of "stagnation" first led to the emergence of esoteric and half-closed informal methodological seminar, and then to its "penetration" into peripheral institutional niches, such as the party education network of the one of the Soviet atomic centers. Leader of the seminar philosopher G.P. Schedrovitsky managed to apply systemic technical approach to the relevant for the Soviet modernity theme of the instrumentalization of thinking and the creation of a collective subject. As a result, this system of "practical philosophy" became popular among Soviet engineer-physicists working in the atomic project.

Suggested Citation

  • Khandozhko, Roman (Хандожко, Роман), 2017. "Interaction of Unofficial Philosophy and the Scientific and Technical Community in the Late USSR: The Case of Obninsk [Взаимодействие Неофициальной Философии И Научно-Технического Сообщества В Позд," Working Papers 051706, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:051706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/wpaper/051706.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:051706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.