IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rnp/wpaper/031838.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Features of the Goals of Antimonopoly Authorities in Developing Countries on the Example of the BRICS Countries
[Особенности Целей Антимонопольных Органов В Развивающихся Странах На Примере Стран Брикс]

Author

Listed:
  • Pavlova, Natalia (Павлова, Наталья)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

Abstract

Currently, an understanding of a special agenda that unites developing countries (in particular, BRICS) from the point of view of their antimonopoly policy is being formed. One of the issues on this agenda is the objectives to be pursued by the antimonopoly authority in a country whose economy belongs to the developing one. Within the framework of this work, specific features that unite the goal setting in the antimonopoly policy of the BRICS countries are defined. To solve this problem, the work reveals the diversity of antimonopoly policy objectives encountered in practice, typologize the antimonopoly authorities in terms of goal-setting and designates the specifics of setting goals for the antimonopoly authorities of the BRICS countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Pavlova, Natalia (Павлова, Наталья), 2018. "Features of the Goals of Antimonopoly Authorities in Developing Countries on the Example of the BRICS Countries [Особенности Целей Антимонопольных Органов В Развивающихся Странах На Примере Стран Б," Working Papers 031838, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:031838
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/wpaper/031838.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frederic Jenny & Yannis Katsoulacos (ed.), 2016. "Competition Law Enforcement in the BRICS and in Developing Countries," International Law and Economics, Springer, number 978-3-319-30948-4, March.
    2. Frederic Jenny, 2016. "The Institutional Design of Competition Authorities: Debates and Trends," International Law and Economics, in: Frederic Jenny & Yannis Katsoulacos (ed.), Competition Law Enforcement in the BRICS and in Developing Countries, pages 1-57, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yannis Katsoulacos & Vasiliki Bageri, 2022. "Objectives and the Optimal Structure of Competition Authorities Revisited," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 69-81, March.
    2. World Bank, 2018. "Indonesia Economic Quarterly, December 2018," World Bank Publications - Reports 30969, The World Bank Group.
    3. Willem H. Boshoff, 2021. "South African competition policy on excessive pricing and its relation to price gouging during the COVID‐19 disaster period," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 89(1), pages 112-140, March.
    4. Tsyganov, Andrey (Цыганов, Андрей) & Pavlova, Nataliya (Павлова, Наталья), 2017. "Multifunctional Antimonopoly Bodies in the World Practice: Advantages and Risks [Многофункциональные Антимонопольные Органы В Мировой Практике: Преимущества И Риски]," Working Papers 031704, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    5. Avdasheva, Svetlana & Golovanova, Svetlana & Katsoulacos, Yannis, 2019. "The role of judicial review in developing evidentiary standards: The example of market analysis in Russian competition law enforcement," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 101-114.
    6. Yannis Katsoulacos & Svetlana Avdasheva & Svetlana Golovanova, 2021. "Determinants of the (Slow) Development of Effect-Based Competition Enforcement: Testing the Impact of Judicial Review on the Choice of Legal Standards by Competition Authorities," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 103-122, March.
    7. Małobęcka-Szwast Iga, 2018. "The Appointment and Dismissal Procedure of the Polish NCA in the Light of EU and International Independence Standards," Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics, Sciendo, vol. 7(2), pages 24-39, December.
    8. S. Avdasheva & S. Golovanova & Y. Katsoulacos, 2019. "Optimal Institutional Structure of Competition Authorities Under Reputation Maximization: A Model and Empirical Evidence from the Case of Russia," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 54(2), pages 251-282, March.
    9. Naoki Sekiguchi, 2022. "The evolution of non-OECD countries in the twenty-first century: developments in steel trade and the role of technology," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 35(1), pages 103-132, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    antimonopoly policy; competition policy; competition authorities; institutional design; BRICS;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:031838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.