Author
Abstract
he scale of the silver economy in South Korea is rapidly expanding, but senior-friendly industries (SFIs) have yet to catch up to growing demand, even as Korea’s demographic crisis poses several daunting challenges to meeting this demand, such as an ongoing shortage of care workers and rising healthcare costs. As these issues affect other industrialized nations as well, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, and China, many governments have set out to capitalize on the growing spending power of seniors by fostering targeted industries, and have also sought to address the dilemma of lack of care workers and mounting medical costs through age tech: technologies and systems designed to improve quality of life for older adults. The lack of SFI products, services, and policies in Korea contrasts with the ever-expanding range products, services and policy programs available in other major economies worldwide. The Korean government needs to give this issue the policy attention it deserves, but has thus far failed to do so, eliminating the budget earmarked for fostering SFIs in 2024 and neglecting to include plans for SFIs and age tech in the current national master plan, which runs up to 2025. As of right now, the Korean government has neither plans nor a budget for SFIs. But as the country’s elderly population explodes, it is now incumbent upon Korean policymakers to devise a comprehensive vision for SFIs, and the policies that emerge from such a vision would do well to focus on age tech. But before doing so, policymakers must first understand the conceptual differences between the silver economy and SFIs. In deciding which industries are to benefit from policy decisions, it is essential to clearly delineate the scope of SFIs; only those industries that mainly or exclusively target seniors as customers or end users should be included. Moreover, in Japan and China, ministries with overlapping portfolios work together on common issues. South Korea’s ministries should do the same, jointly establishing and implementing comprehensive plans to promote age tech and SFIs. Only by doing so can Korea hope to mitigate the social and economic costs of its graying population while fostering SFIs as a new engine for economic growth.
Suggested Citation
Sukkyung Kim, 2024.
"Senior-friendly industries in South Korea today and future policy directions,"
Research Papers
24/9, Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade.
Handle:
RePEc:ris:kietrp:2024_009
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- L16 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Industrial Organization and Macroeconomics; Macroeconomic Industrial Structure
- L80 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - General
- L88 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Government Policy
- R23 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following
NEP Reports:
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:kietrp:2024_009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aaron Crossen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kiettkr.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.