IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

de la nature de l’innovation (The nature of innovation)

  • Rémy Volpi

    ()

    (labrii, ULCO)

Registered author(s):

    Marx par la lutte des classes, Schumpeter par l’innovation, concluent que le capitalisme par nature s’autodétruit. Mais, alors que pour Marx le capitalisme rend les riches plus riches tandis que leurs rangs s’étiolent, et les pauvres plus pauvres et plus nombreux, pour Schumpeter, le capitalisme démocratise la consommation. Et pour Galbraith, l’opulence est réelle, mais obtenue au prix de l’instrumentalisation du consommateur. D’autres auteurs imaginent que pour faire reprendre des couleurs à un capitalisme anémié, il faut investir l’argent des contribuables dans le complexe militaroindustriel, afin de susciter des percées technologiques qui généreront des produits dont nous n’avons aucune idée mais dont le grand public raffolera. En fait, la nature de l’innovation n’est pas technologique mais sociétale : sinon, comment comprendre le succès de Coca-Cola, McDonald’s ou Starbucks ? Le succès de Ford ou d’Edison trouve son origine dans une vision sociétale. Nous ne savons pas ce que nous voulons, mais l’innovateur sait ce que allons vouloir. Marx through class-struggle, Schumpeter through innovation, concluded that capitalism is inherently self-destructive. But whereas for Marx capitalism makes the rich richer and fewer and the poor poorer and more numerous, for Schumpeter, capitalism democratises consumption. And for Galbraith, affluent society is real, but gained through subduing the consumers. Other authors fancy that for a languid capitalism to regain health, it is relevant to invest taxpayers’ money into the military-industrial complex, so as to generate technological breakthroughs that will make products we have by now no clue of available to the public. Hence capitalism is likely to get rosier colours. In fact the nature of innovation is not technological but societal: if not, how to understand the success of Coca-Cola, McDonald’s or Starbucks? The success of Ford or Edison is rooted into their societal insights. We do not know for sure what we want, but the innovator knows what we shall like

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://riifr.univ-littoral.fr/wp-content/uploads/2006/12/doc133.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Laboratoire de Recherche sur l'Industrie et l'Innovation. ULCO / Research Unit on Industry and Innovation in its series Working Papers with number 133.

    as
    in new window

    Length: 23 pages
    Date of creation: Sep 2006
    Date of revision:
    Publication status: Published in Cahiers du Lab.RII, Séptembre2006
    Handle: RePEc:rii:riidoc:133
    Contact details of provider: Postal: Maison de la recherche en sciences de l'homme, 21 quai de la Citadelle, 59140 Dunkerque
    Phone: (33) 3 28 23 71 35
    Fax: (33) 3 28 23 71 43 or (33) 3 28 23 71 10
    Web page: http://riifr.univ-littoral.fr/
    Email:


    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rii:riidoc:133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Philippe Chagnon)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.