IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Home production and discrimination: a joint explanation for recent trends of gender differentials in education and in the labor market


  • Andrea Moro
  • Luca Flabbi

    () (Economics Georgetown University)


The two main trends in gender differentials in the last decade suggest an apparently contradictory picture: women still experience a significant negative differential in wages but not in education, where they moved from a negative to a positive differential. We propose and estimate a model where employer’s discrimination is allow to change over-time. Females have the same preferences as males, and, other things being equal, would, on average, make the same human capital investment and labor market decisions. However, because of an (endogenous) comparative advantage in child rearing, more women choose to suspend labor market attachment than their male partners in their prime age. Hence, because of a standard statistical discrimination argument, they receive lower labor market outcomes than males. The only way they can compensate for the loss arising from statistical discrimination is to choose higher investment in human capital, generating equilibria where female average human capital investment is higher than males'. If discrimination is too high, however, no reasonable amount of higher human capital investment can compensate for the difference and more women choose to specialize in home production

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Moro & Luca Flabbi, 2006. "Home production and discrimination: a joint explanation for recent trends of gender differentials in education and in the labor market," 2006 Meeting Papers 724, Society for Economic Dynamics.
  • Handle: RePEc:red:sed006:724

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item


    Gender discrimination; Education gap;

    JEL classification:

    • J7 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Discrimination


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed006:724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christian Zimmermann). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.