IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Does Child Work Decrease with Parental Income?: The Luxury Axiom Revisited in India

Listed author(s):
  • Uma Kambhampati


    (Department of Economics, University of Reading)

In this paper, we analyse the determinants of child work and schooling in rural India within a bivariate probit framework. Our sample consists of 93,825 children (6-15 year olds) from the 50th Round of the NSS in India. Our primary focu8s is whether an increase in the wages earned by fathers and mothers in our sample would help decrease the work done by children. Two results stand out from our analysis. First, we can confirm the luxury axiom in India - and increase in mother's and father's wages does decrease child work. The effect is neither continuous nor monotonic in the case of mother's wages, however. In fact, we find that mother's work actually increases the probability of child (especially girls) work, though this effect is mitigated by an increase in mother's wages. Second, mother's education (rather than employment or wates0 is the single most significant factor decreasing the probability of children working.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Henley Business School, Reading University in its series Economics & Management Discussion Papers with number em-dp2004-02.

in new window

Length: 24 pages
Date of creation: Feb 2004
Handle: RePEc:rdg:emxxdp:em-dp2004-02
Contact details of provider: Postal:
PO Box 218, Whiteknights, Reading, Berks, RG6 6AA

Phone: +44 (0) 118 378 8226
Fax: +44 (0) 118 975 0236
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rdg:emxxdp:em-dp2004-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marie Pearson)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.