IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ran/wpaper/dru-2463.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Stock-Flow Analysis of the Welfare Caseload Insights from California Economic Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Jacob Alex Klerman
  • Steven Haider

Abstract

During the 1990s, the welfare caseload peaked and then declined by about half. The decline occurred simultaneously with a robust economic expansion and a series of major welfare reforms. This paper reconsiders the methods used in the previous studies to explain these changes. The authors explicitly model the welfare caseload as the net outcome of past flows onto and off of aid and explore the implications of such a stock-flow perspective for understanding the determinants of the caseload size and its evolution over time. The approach is shown to explain some of the anomalous findings in the literature regarding the effects of economic conditions on the welfare caseload. Then, using administrative data for California, the authors estimate the effect of the changing unemployment rate on the underlying flows and simulate the impact of the caseload stock. They find that approximately 50 percent of the caseload decline in California can be attributed to the declining unemployment rate. These estimates are substantially larger than the 20 to 35 percent estimates that are obtained from more traditional methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacob Alex Klerman & Steven Haider, 2000. "A Stock-Flow Analysis of the Welfare Caseload Insights from California Economic Conditions," Working Papers DRU-2463, RAND Corporation.
  • Handle: RePEc:ran:wpaper:dru-2463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/drafts/2007/DRU2463.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rebecca M. Blank, 2002. "Evaluating Welfare Reform in the United States," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 40(4), pages 1105-1166, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ran:wpaper:dru-2463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Benson Wong). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/lpranus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.