Are Price Equations Really Money Demand Equations on their Heads?
It is often argued that the dependent variable in money demand functions is really the price level, the money stock itself being exogenous. A recent approach which stresses the theme is the "buffer stock" hypothesis, in which money supply shocks explicitly appear in the demand for money function, because prices and interest rates do not adjust rapidly enough to bring about short-run equilibrium in the money market. Although this approach has been adopted by a number of authors, it is not been subjected to much econometric testing. In this paper, we outline the economic and econometric issues involved in testing the exogenous money/buffer stock hypothesis, and subject it to a variety of tests using three different data sets. None of our results supports the hypothesis. Fundamental restrictions are rejected at very high levels of significance, and a reasonably good money demand equation is seen to be badly misspecified if interpreted as a price equation.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||1986|
|Date of revision:|
|Publication status:||Published in Journal of Applied Econometrics, 3, 1988|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: (613) 533-2250
Fax: (613) 533-6668
Web page: http://qed.econ.queensu.ca/Email:
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mark Babcock)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.