IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Are Price Equations Really Money Demand Equations on their Heads?

Listed author(s):
  • James G. MacKinnon
  • Ross D. Milbourne

It is often argued that the dependent variable in money demand functions is really the price level, the money stock itself being exogenous. A recent approach which stresses the theme is the "buffer stock" hypothesis, in which money supply shocks explicitly appear in the demand for money function, because prices and interest rates do not adjust rapidly enough to bring about short-run equilibrium in the money market. Although this approach has been adopted by a number of authors, it is not been subjected to much econometric testing. In this paper, we outline the economic and econometric issues involved in testing the exogenous money/buffer stock hypothesis, and subject it to a variety of tests using three different data sets. None of our results supports the hypothesis. Fundamental restrictions are rejected at very high levels of significance, and a reasonably good money demand equation is seen to be badly misspecified if interpreted as a price equation.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Queen's University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 646.

in new window

Length: 31 pages
Date of creation: 1986
Publication status: Published in Journal of Applied Econometrics, 3, 1988
Handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:646
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6

Phone: (613) 533-2250
Fax: (613) 533-6668
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mark Babcock)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.