Estimating the Value of Life and Injury for Pedestrians Using a Stated Preference Framework
Download full text from publisher
Other versions of this item:
- Glenn P. Jenkins & Naghmeh Niroomand, 2017. "Estimating the Value of Life and Injury for Pedestrians Using a Stated Preference Framework," Development Discussion Papers 2017-11, JDI Executive Programs.
CitationsCitations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Niroomand, Naghmeh & Jenkins, Glenn P., 2018.
"A comparison of stated preference methods for the valuation of improvement in road safety,"
Economic Analysis and Policy,
Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 138-149.
- Naghmeh Niroomand & Glenn P. Jenkins, 2016. "A Comparison of Stated Preference Methods for the Valuation of Improvement in Road Safety," Development Discussion Papers 2016-10, JDI Executive Programs.
More about this item
KeywordsWillingness to pay; choice experiment; value of a statistical life; value of an injury; road safety; pedestrians;
- D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
- C25 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; Proportions; Probabilities
- Q50 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - General
- J17 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Value of Life; Foregone Income
- R41 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion; Travel Time; Safety and Accidents; Transportation Noise
NEP fieldsThis paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-HEA-2018-03-26 (Health Economics)
- NEP-TRE-2018-03-26 (Transport Economics)
- NEP-UPT-2018-03-26 (Utility Models & Prospect Theory)
StatisticsAccess and download statistics
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:dpaper:5000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mark Babcock). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.