IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/12539.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

IFRS vs AAOIFI: The Clash of Standards?

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Ibrahim, Shahul Hameed

Abstract

“The Islamic financial industry needs a corresponding alternative set of accounting standards which can at best be harmonized, not standardized due to the different nature and activities of the Islamic banks and financial institutions. These standards already exist, developed by an industry led non profit organization based in Bahrain- the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions established in 1991. The IASB should reconsider its position and allow alternatives- live and let live, just as there is a need for differential reporting requirements for small and medium businesses.”

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Ibrahim, Shahul Hameed, 2007. "IFRS vs AAOIFI: The Clash of Standards?," MPRA Paper 12539, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:12539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/12539/1/MPRA_paper_12539.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kamla, Rania & Haque, Faizul, 2019. "Islamic accounting, neo-imperialism and identity staging: The Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Islamic Accounting; Accounting Standards; Islamic Accounting Standards; Alternatives to IFRS;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M4 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:12539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.