IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/118520.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysing the extractive industry fiscal policies in sub-Saharan Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Ranjan, Harshali

Abstract

Buried beneath the surface of sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is an abundance of valuable and extractable natural resources, making its mining industry one of the most important in the world (Garside, 2020). Out of the 54 countries in Africa, 20 are considered by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to be rich in natural resources i.e., countries whose natural resources account for more than 25 per cent of total exports. All 20 of these countries are situated in SSA and, as such, the significant weight of the extractive sector in these states raises the question of the taxation of these natural resources, which are non-renewable, in the region (Bouterige et al., 2020). Various sub-Saharan countries, in recent years, have been introducing legal and regulatory changes with the aim to increase the revenues from mining and improve community engagement/ participation in mining projects to further popularise this sector (Poustie et al., 2019). Following an increase in commodity prices in the 2000s and recent natural reserve discoveries in the region, many countries in SSA reformed their mining acts to shift the onus of taxation onto the mining companies. As such, increase in mining royalty rates, reappearance of mineral resource rent taxes and of free equity for the State have been observed throughout the region (Bouterige et al., 2020). For example, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) published a new mining code on 28 March 2018 to increase royalty payments as well as increase taxes by 2-10%. It also introduced a new "super profits" tax of 50% on profits exceeding 25% of the forecasted value. Furthermore, it introduced an obligation for 0.3% of turnover to be contributed to development projects and that 10% of the capital of mining companies to be held by Congolese citizens. Similarly, Zambia has recently taken steps to deal with dwindling foreign currency reserves and increasing public debt. These include an increase in the country's sliding scale for mining royalties in September 2019 (including a new 10% tax when the price of copper exceeds $7,500 per tonne), an announcement in October 2018 that mines will have to pay royalties in dollars to help stabilise the Kwacha, introduction of new mining duties and a new sales tax in December 2018; and the introduction of a new 5% copper import duty (Poustie et al., 2019). However, this vast abundance of natural resources and the various measures put in place to tax the mining sector in SSA doesn’t necessarily translate to social gains for the countries in this region (Maroun et al., 2019). Despite being rich in resources and having a lot of investors, countries in SSA still tend to lose out on revenue from the extractive sector. Inadequate legal and regulatory frameworks, ineffective administrative systems and widespread tax evasion by mining companies are often cited as the main culprits for this loss in tax revenues. Lack of access to information required to impose the right amount of taxes, monitor compliance and audit mining companies often prevents revenue administrations from employing even their basic frameworks and systems. As a result, the region loses out annually on mining taxes accounting up to 6% of African GDP (Linder, 2019).

Suggested Citation

  • Ranjan, Harshali, 2021. "Analysing the extractive industry fiscal policies in sub-Saharan Africa," MPRA Paper 118520, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:118520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/118520/1/ANALYSINGTHEEXTRACTIVEINDUSTRYFISCALPOLICIESINSUB-SAHARANAFRICA.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economics; policy; development economics; extractive industry; africa; tanzania; social policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E0 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General
    • F0 - International Economics - - General
    • H2 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
    • H3 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents
    • P0 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:118520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.