IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/phd/dpaper/dp_2001-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Public-Private-Community Partnerships in Management and Delivery of Water to Urban Poor: The Case of Metro Manila

Author

Listed:
  • David, Cristina C.
  • Inocencio, Arlene B.

Abstract

In the Philippines, the Public-Private-Community Partnerships (PPCPs) are serving the poor with water through public faucets, group taps, bulk water, and individual connections. The removal of technical and institutional barriers in providing water in urban poor communities or informal settlements in Metro Manila has allowed delivery of different forms of water services in these areas. This delivery of service results in benefits to the poor which include access to and availability of safe and better quality water, much reduced cost to households, increased per capita consumption contributing to better health and sanitation, and freed-up time which households now use for more childcare, income earning activities, and even more leisure. The principal partners in this PPCPs are the government as represented by the residual water utility and the regulatory office as well as the local government, the private sector as represented by the two private concessionaires of the water utility, and the local associations and nongovernment organizations. Participation of the different parties ranged from small, informal and immediate as in the contribution of labor or mobilization of a community, or capability building and empowering of a community, to more substantial, formal and continuing such as the concession agreement between the water utility and the private concessionaires, the management of a mini water distribution system or a billing and collection contract. There are indications and good reasons to believe that provision of water for the poor and poor communities can be a potent tool for alleviating poverty as it impacts on health, income and consumption, and gender and social inclusion. In this sense, the PPCPs which are delivering water to the poor are contributing to poverty alleviation. The valuable lessons learned in the case of Metro Manila maybe operationalized and improved to comprise good practices applicable to other water utilities in other areas.

Suggested Citation

  • David, Cristina C. & Inocencio, Arlene B., 2001. "Public-Private-Community Partnerships in Management and Delivery of Water to Urban Poor: The Case of Metro Manila," Discussion Papers DP 2001-18, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2001-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pids.gov.ph/publication/discussion-papers/public-private-community-partnerships-in-management-and-delivery-of-water-to-urban-poor-the-case-of-metro-manila
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cuaresma, Jocelyn C., 2004. "Pro-Poor Water Services in Metro Manila: In Search for Greater Equity," Centre on Regulation and Competition (CRC) Working papers 30635, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).
    2. World Bank, 2020. "Municipal Public-Private Partnership Framework," World Bank Publications - Reports 33572, The World Bank Group.
    3. Israel, Danilo C., 2011. "An Assessment of the Local Service Delivery of Potable Water in Dumaguete City and Selected Areas of Agusan del Sur Province," Philippine Journal of Development PJD 2009 Vol. XXXVI No. 2, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    4. Israel, Danilo C., 2009. "Local Service Delivery of Potable Water in the Philippines: National Review and Case Analysis," Discussion Papers DP 2009-38, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    5. Llanto, Gilberto M., 2013. "Water Financing Programs in the Philippines: Are We Making Progress?," Discussion Papers DP 2013-34, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2001-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aniceto Orbeta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pidgvph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.