IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pcc/pccumd/12cmafc.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Response to the Congressional Hearing on Medicare's Durable Medical Equipment Competitive Bidding Program

Author

Abstract

On 11 September 2012, the Subcommittee on Healthcare and Technology of the United States House Committee on Small Business led by Chairwoman Renee Ellmers (R-NC) and Ranking Member Cedric Richmond (D-LA) held a hearing on Medicare’s Durable Medical Equipment Competitive Bidding Program, which is in its pilot stage, but soon is to expand to over one-half of the country. The program is administered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Under the 2003 Medicare Modernization Act, Congress mandated CMS to identify providers and price home medical equipment through competitive bid. The hearing helped illuminate the serious problems with the current program. As an auction expert and someone quite knowledgeable with both CMS’ current program and the stakeholders’ Market Pricing Program, which replaces the current program with a modern efficient auction, I provide comments on CMS’ testimony.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Cramton, 2012. "Response to the Congressional Hearing on Medicare's Durable Medical Equipment Competitive Bidding Program," Papers of Peter Cramton 12cmafc, University of Maryland, Department of Economics - Peter Cramton, revised 2012.
    • Handle: RePEc:pcc:pccumd:12cmafc
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cramton.umd.edu/papers2010-2014/cramton-house-small-business-hearing-comments-19-sep-2012.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Medicare auctions; health care auctions; procurement auctions;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D44 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Auctions
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pcc:pccumd:12cmafc. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Cramton (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cramton.umd.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.