IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/wqka2_v1.html

Cross-Country Differences in Citizens‘ Reactions to Arms Transfers. How united is NATO?

Author

Listed:
  • Haggerty, Fabian

    (LMU Munich)

  • Rudolph, Lukas

    (LMU Munich)

  • Thurner, Paul

Abstract

Weapons transfers to foreign countries became politicized in Western democracies in recent years, whereby security-related, economic, and normative aspects are discussed. We propose that how these different (perhaps conflicting) aspects are weighted is indicative of a more general strategic culture of countries. We investigate how the public views these dimensions and how homogeneous the underlying preference structure in NATO’s top arms-exporting democracies (the US, UK, France, Germany, and Italy) is. Using a multidimensional measurement strategy via a conjoint experiment (N ∼ 10, 000), we show that normative aspects predominate for all populations when forming preferences on export policies. However, we observe that Germany and Italy are essentially divided from the other three countries, regarding whether security aspects are considered in preference formation. Building on recent (machine learning) methods, we propose that this difference is primarily attributed to the country of the respondents, indicating different strategic subcultures with implications for countries’ foreign policy behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Haggerty, Fabian & Rudolph, Lukas & Thurner, Paul, 2026. "Cross-Country Differences in Citizens‘ Reactions to Arms Transfers. How united is NATO?," SocArXiv wqka2_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:wqka2_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/wqka2_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/69fcd81948fcadc3ce8395f0/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/wqka2_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asif Efrat & Omer Yair, 2024. "Should we sell arms to human rights violators? What the public thinks," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 694-712, August.
    2. Naoki Egami & Kosuke Imai, 2019. "Causal Interaction in Factorial Experiments: Application to Conjoint Analysis," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(526), pages 529-540, April.
    3. Lukas Rudolph & Fabian Haggerty & Paul W. Thurner, 2026. "Examining public support for Ukraine’s defense against autocratic aggression," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Hainmueller, Jens & Hopkins, Daniel J. & Yamamoto, Teppei, 2014. "Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 1-30, January.
    5. Nicolas Van der Linden & Christophe Leys & Olivier Klein & Pierre Bouchat, 2017. "Are attitudes toward peace and war the two sides of the same coin? Evidence to the contrary from a French validation of the Attitudes Toward Peace and War Scale," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Heinrich, Tobias & Kobayashi, Yoshiharu, 2020. "How Do People Evaluate Foreign Aid To ‘Nasty’ Regimes?," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(1), pages 103-127, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vrânceanu, Alina & Dinas, Elias & Heidland, Tobias & Ruhs, Martin, 2023. "The European refugee crisis and public support for the externalisation of migration management," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 279441, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    2. Lukas Rudolph & Fabian Haggerty & Paul W. Thurner, 2026. "Examining public support for Ukraine’s defense against autocratic aggression," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Kim, Sung Eun & Park, Jong Hee & Rhee, Inbok & Yang, Joonseok, 2025. "What do aid recipients want? Public attitudes toward foreign aid in developing countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    4. Rudolph, Lukas & Freitag, Markus & Thurner, Paul, 2021. "The Comparative Legitimacy of Arms Exports - A Conjoint Experiment in Germany and France," SocArXiv r73pv, Center for Open Science.
    5. Sokolov, Boris, 2025. "Causal Estimands for Policy Evaluation and Beyond," SocArXiv 4vtpk_v1, Center for Open Science.
    6. Kao, Kristen & Lust, Ellen & Dulani, Boniface & Ferree, Karen E. & Harris, Adam S. & Metheney, Erica, 2021. "The ABCs of Covid-19 prevention in Malawi: Authority, benefits, and costs of compliance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    7. Austin J Knuppe, 2022. "Blowback or overblown? Why civilians under threat support invasive foreign intervention," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 59(4), pages 478-494, July.
    8. Barış Arı & Burak Sonmez, 2025. "Human rights violations and public support for sanctions," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(1), pages 68-84, January.
    9. Gosciak, Jennah & Molitor, Daniel & Lundberg, Ian, 2025. "Adaptive Randomization in Conjoint Survey Experiments," SocArXiv 69y2j_v1, Center for Open Science.
    10. Mark D. Ramirez, 2021. "Unmasking the American death penalty debate: Race, context, and citizens’ willingness to execute," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(4), pages 1931-1946, July.
    11. Lisanne de Blok & Max Heermann & Julian Schuessler & Dirk Leuffen & Catherine E. de Vries, 2024. "All on board? The role of institutional design for public support for differentiated integration," European Union Politics, , vol. 25(3), pages 593-604, September.
    12. Chaikaew, Pasicha & Hodges, Alan W. & Grunwald, Sabine, 2017. "Estimating the value of ecosystem services in a mixed-use watershed: A choice experiment approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 228-237.
    13. Catherine E De Vries & Simon Hix & Miriam Sorace, 2025. "Reforming supranational institutions: Insights from a conjoint experiment in 16 countries," European Union Politics, , vol. 26(4), pages 649-666, December.
    14. Jiawei Fu & Xiaojun Li, 2024. "A Formal Theory of Survey Experiment Generalizability: Attention and Salience," Papers 2405.06779, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    15. Dylan Bugden & Jesse Brazil, 2024. "The role of geostrategic interests in motivating public support for foreign climate aid," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 14(4), pages 803-813, December.
    16. Henrik Serup Christensen & Lauri Rapeli, 2021. "Immediate rewards or delayed gratification? A conjoint survey experiment of the public’s policy preferences," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(1), pages 63-94, March.
    17. Okada, Isamu, 2024. "What procedures matter to social acceptance of mining? A conjoint experiment in Peru," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    18. Wietzke, Frank-Borge, 2024. "Perceptions of social class in Africa. Results from a conjoint experiment," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    19. Robert Kubinec, 2018. "Patrons or Clients? Measuring and Experimentally Evaluating Political Connections of Firms in Morocco and Jordan," Working Papers 1280, Economic Research Forum, revised 26 Dec 2018.
    20. Heap, Shaun P. Hargreaves & Koop, Christel & Matakos, Konstantinos & Unan, Asli & Weber, Nina Sophie, 2021. "We Cannot Disagree Forever! Reality Polarization and Citizens’ Post-Pandemic Fiscal Adjustment Preferences," SocArXiv 69tup, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:wqka2_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.