IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/rfsyu_v1.html

Digital capacity in Brazilian municipalities: fiscal autonomy, bureaucratic structure and heterogeneity

Author

Listed:
  • Paiva, Yago

    (School of Public Policy, Government and Business of the Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV EPPG))

  • Lui, Lizandro

Abstract

Over the past decades, digital transformation has become a central aspect of state modernization. In this article, we treat this process as a form of state capacity building — specifically, of the digital capacity of the state. Our aim is to assess whether, at the municipal level, fiscal capacity and bureaucratic quality account for higher levels of digital capacity. To this end, we adapt to the municipal context a concept originally formulated for national states and construct the Municipal Digital Capacity Index (ICDM), a novel and comprehensive measure built from the seven waves of the Brazilian Survey of Basic Municipal Information (MUNIC) that include an information and communication technology module between 2004 and 2024, covering virtually all Brazilian municipalities in each wave. Using the ICDM as the dependent variable, we estimate panel models designed to recover between-municipality effects. Fiscal autonomy is the strongest determinant of digital capacity, with a magnitude far exceeding that of bureaucratic attributes, whose effects are positive but modest. None of these effects, however, operates uniformly: own-source revenue yields more in low-income municipalities, staff qualification pays off only where there is organizational structure to absorb it, and the share of politically appointed staff, whose average effect is null, is positive in poorer municipalities and negative in wealthier ones.

Suggested Citation

  • Paiva, Yago & Lui, Lizandro, 2026. "Digital capacity in Brazilian municipalities: fiscal autonomy, bureaucratic structure and heterogeneity," SocArXiv rfsyu_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:rfsyu_v1
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/rfsyu_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6ac7a1abbe285cefb5942ee3/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/rfsyu_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adcock, Robert & Collier, David, 2001. "Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 95(3), pages 529-546, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Renato Tibiriçá de Saboya & Otavio Martins Peres, 2025. "CHASM: A configurational measure of socio-spatial residential segregation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 52(6), pages 1464-1481, July.
    2. Schakel, Arjan Hille, 2009. "A Postfunctionalist Theory of Regional Government," MPRA Paper 21596, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Zim Nwokora & Riccardo Pelizzo, 2017. "Measuring Party System Change: A Systems Perspective," Research Africa Network Working Papers 17/048, Research Africa Network (RAN).
    4. Gustav Lidén, 2013. "What about theory? The consequences on a widened perspective of social theory," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 213-225, January.
    5. Tom Christensen & Mads Dagnis Jensen & Michael Kluth & Gunnar Helgi Kristinsson & Kennet Lynggaard & Per Lægreid & Risto Niemikari & Jon Pierre & Tapio Raunio & Gústaf Adolf Skúlason, 2023. "The Nordic governments' responses to the Covid‐19 pandemic: A comparative study of variation in governance arrangements and regulatory instruments," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 658-676, July.
    6. Malte Luebker, 2019. "Can the Structure of Inequality Explain Fiscal Redistribution? Revisiting the Social Affinity Hypothesis," LIS Working papers 762, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    7. J. C. Sharman, 2007. "Rationalist and Constructivist Perspectives on Reputation," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(1), pages 20-37, March.
    8. E. M. Hoeben & W. Steenbeek & L. J. R. Pauwels, 2018. "Measuring Disorder: Observer Bias in Systematic Social Observations at Streets and Neighborhoods," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 221-249, March.
    9. Jørgen Møller, 2016. "Composite and Loose Concepts, Historical Analogies, and the Logic of Control in Comparative Historical Analysis," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 45(4), pages 651-677, November.
    10. Nora Lustig, 2013. "Commitment to Equity: Diagnostic Questionnaire," Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series 02, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    11. Alessia Damonte & Giulia Bazzan, 2024. "Rules as data," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 657-673, July.
    12. Nuno Garoupa & Rok Spruk, 2024. "Measuring Political Institutions in the Long Run: A Latent Variable Analysis of Political Regimes, 1810–2018," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 867-914, July.
    13. Muhammad Nabeel Siddiqui, 2013. "Impact Of Work Life Conflict On Employee Performance," Far East Journal of Psychology and Business, Far East Research Centre, vol. 12(3), pages 26-40, September.
    14. María Santos Corrada & Jose A. Flecha Ortiz & Rafael Méndez-Tejeda & Dra. Evelyn Lopez & Leonardo Ortegón-Cortázar & Glenda Muñiz Umaña, 2026. "Consumer Attitudes Towards Circular Economic Products in Latin America and the Caribbean: Factors that Transform Ethical Purchase Intention Into Ethical Purchase Behavior," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 1-26, April.
    15. Liesbet Hooghe & Gary Marks, 2015. "Delegation and pooling in international organizations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 305-328, September.
    16. Sherry Zaks, 2024. "Do we know it when we see it? (Re)-conceptualizing rebel-to-party transition," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(2), pages 246-262, March.
    17. Jose Antonio Alonso & Ana Luiza Cortez & Stephan Klasen, 2014. "LDC and other country groupings: How useful are current approaches to classify countries in a more hetergeneous developing world?," CDP Background Papers 021, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    18. Jacint Jordana & Xavier Fernández‐i‐Marín & Andrea C. Bianculli, 2018. "Agency proliferation and the globalization of the regulatory state: Introducing a data set on the institutional features of regulatory agencies," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 524-540, December.
    19. Vanessa Alexandra Boese & Matthew Charles Wilson, 2023. "Contestation and participation: Concepts, measurement, and inference," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 26(2), pages 89-106, June.
    20. Willem E. Saris & André Pirralha & Diana Zavala-Rojas, 2018. "Testing the Comparability of Different Types of Social Indicators Across Groups," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 927-939, February.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:rfsyu_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.