IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v52y2025i6p1464-1481.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CHASM: A configurational measure of socio-spatial residential segregation

Author

Listed:
  • Renato Tibiriçá de Saboya
  • Otavio Martins Peres

Abstract

Despite recent advances in the quantification of residential segregation, several important limitations persist. Zone-based measures have low resolution and treat all locations inside a zone as identical; oversimplify the possibility of interaction between zones; and underestimate the role of the street layout and how it can shape potential movement and exposure. Here, we propose a new measure of socio-spatial residential segregation called CHASM that estimates potential exposure between different social groups based on their positions in the street grid and comparing them to a hypothetical scenario in which all groups are evenly distributed (i.e., a situation of non-segregation). Depending on the type of centrality chosen for the analysis, its scores represent the degree to which the distances of a street segment to the different social groups are unevenly distributed or, alternatively, the degree to which different social groups tend to avoid sharing the same street segments in their trips. We tested CHASM’s validity through a random permutation test in a hypothetical scenario and a comparison with more traditional measures in a medium-sized Brazilian city. The results suggest that CHASM is indeed able to quantify residential segregation and: (a) better estimates distances, connections, and continuities between different areas of the city, including the implications of barriers that are overlooked in zone-based measures; (b) minimizes distortions introduced by zones’ arbitrary shapes; and (c) opens up new possibilities for testing alternative designs for the street system.

Suggested Citation

  • Renato Tibiriçá de Saboya & Otavio Martins Peres, 2025. "CHASM: A configurational measure of socio-spatial residential segregation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 52(6), pages 1464-1481, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:52:y:2025:i:6:p:1464-1481
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083241287701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083241287701
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083241287701?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:52:y:2025:i:6:p:1464-1481. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.