IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/8e659.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Understanding how policy settings affect developer decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Rowley, Steven
  • Leishman, Chris
  • Olatunji, Oluwole
  • Zuo, Jian
  • Crowe, Adam

Abstract

This research examined how policy settings and new construction technologies and processes affect developer decisions to provide private sector housing supply and might improve affordability. The complexity of the development process, the structure of development organisations, the variety of products delivered, and land ownership issues mean the development decision-making process varies by organisation and site by site. Therefore, it is too simplistic to assume policy settings will have exactly the same impact on each and every developer and on each and every site. Development projects can take many years and generally developers estimate what their products would sell for in the current market using comparable evidence to determine potential sales prices and then apply a revenue escalation figure to try and forecast the actual sales price on project completion. This is fraught with difficulty due to price fluctuations even in the short term, let alone on development projects which may span 10 years. Developers usually adopt a conservative approach to price escalation to avoid overestimating revenues and delivering inflated return projections. The second biggest risk factor identified by interviewees was the planning process. Planning policy settings determine what a developer can do on a site. This means that the political stance of the local planning authority can actually deter a developer from operating across the whole of an LGA. The potential for timelines to blow out or last-minute changes forced upon developers increases risks and can reduce return, leading to developers avoiding certain areas. Modelling shows a more efficient development approval process, including planning, infrastructure and environmental approvals, which reduces timeframes has the potential to provide a major boost to project profitability.

Suggested Citation

  • Rowley, Steven & Leishman, Chris & Olatunji, Oluwole & Zuo, Jian & Crowe, Adam, 2022. "Understanding how policy settings affect developer decisions," SocArXiv 8e659, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:8e659
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/8e659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6306f9d3f706821baffa2e1c/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/8e659?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murray, Cameron, 2021. "Explainer: Do taxes on property cause high house prices? No," OSF Preprints nv596, Center for Open Science.
    2. Randolph, Bill & Troy, Laurence & Milligan, Vivienne & van den Nouwelant, Ryan & Hayward, Richard Donald, 2018. "Paying for affordable housing in different market contexts," SocArXiv 38xu2, Center for Open Science.
    3. Chris Leishman, 2015. "Housing Supply and Suppliers: Are the Microeconomics of Housing Developers Important?," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 580-600, July.
    4. Huang, Donna & Rowley, Steven & Crowe, Adam & Gilbert, Catherine & Kruger, Marko & Leishman, Chris & Zuo, Jian, 2020. "Responding to the pandemic, can building homes rebuild Australia?," SocArXiv 9rpaq, Center for Open Science.
    5. Huang, Donna & Gilbert, Catherine & Rowley, Steven & Gurran, Nicole & Leishman, Chris & Mouritz, Mike & Raynor, Katrina & Cornell, Christen, 2020. "Urban regulation and diverse housing supply: An Investigative Panel," SocArXiv k49pd, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leishman, Chris & Aminpour, Fatemeh & Baker, Emma & Beer, Andrew & Crowe, Adam & Goodall, Zoë & Horton, Ella & Jacobs, Keith & Lester, Laurence & Maclennan, Duncan, 2022. "Australia’s COVID-19 pandemic housing policy responses," SocArXiv yef47, Center for Open Science.
    2. Stephen Malpezzi, 2023. "Housing affordability and responses during times of stress: A preliminary look during the COVID‐19 pandemic," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 41(1), pages 9-40, January.
    3. Lawson, Julie & Pawson, Hal & Troy, Laurence & van den Nouwelant, Ryan & Hamilton, Carrie & Hayward, Richard Donald, 2018. "Social housing as infrastructure: an investment pathway," SocArXiv e9hky, Center for Open Science.
    4. Gurran, Nicole & Rowley, Steven & Milligan, Vivienne & Randolph, Bill & Phibbs, Peter & Gilbert, Catherine & James, Amity & Troy, Laurence & van den Nouwelant, Ryan & Hayward, Richard Donald, 2018. "Inquiry into increasing affordable housing supply: Evidence-based principles and strategies for Australian policy and practice," SocArXiv mt5vw, Center for Open Science.
    5. Huang, Donna & Gilbert, Catherine & Rowley, Steven & Gurran, Nicole & Leishman, Chris & Mouritz, Mike & Raynor, Katrina & Cornell, Christen, 2020. "Urban regulation and diverse housing supply: An Investigative Panel," SocArXiv k49pd, Center for Open Science.
    6. Ghasri, Milad & Stone, Wendy & Easthope, Hazel & Veeroja, Piret, 2022. "Predicting risk to inform housing policy and practice," SocArXiv shk5j, Center for Open Science.
    7. Martin, Chris & Lawson, Julie & Milligan, Vivienne & Hartley, Chris & Pawson, Hal & Dodson, Jago, 2023. "Towards an Australian Housing and Homelessness Strategy: understanding national approaches in contemporary policy," SocArXiv h5tja, Center for Open Science.
    8. Rowley, Steven & Brierty, Ryan & Perugia, Francesca & Rahman, Habib & Singh, Ranjodh & Swapan, Mohammad & Taylor, Elizabeth, 2023. "The new normal: changed patterns of dwelling demand and supply," SocArXiv t85rj, Center for Open Science.
    9. Faulkner, Debbie & Sharam, Andrea & James, Amity & Tually, Selina & Barrie, Helen, 2023. "Inquiry into housing policies and practices for precariously housed older Australians," SocArXiv cuksd, Center for Open Science.
    10. Gilbert, Catherine & Gurran, Nicole, 2021. "Can ceding planning controls for major projects support metropolitan housing supply and diversity? The case of Sydney, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:8e659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.