IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/9hzfe.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Visualizing and Interpreting Multi-Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Buchanan, Erin Michelle

    (Harrisburg University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

Latent variable modeling as a lens for psychometric theory is a popular tool for social scientists to examine measurement of constructs (Beaujean, 2014). Journals such as Assessment regularly publish articles supporting measures of latent constructs wherein a measurement model is established. Confirmatory factor analysis can be used to investigate the replicability and generalizability of the measurement model in new samples, while multi-group confirmatory factor analysis is used to examine the measurement model across groups within samples (Brown, 2015). With the rise of the replication crisis and “psychology’s renaissance” (Nelson et al., 2018), interest in divergence in measurement has increased, often focused on small parameter differences within the latent model. This manuscript outlines ways to visualize potential non-invariance, to supplement large numbers of tables that often overwhelm a reader within these published reports. Readers will learn how to interpret the impact and size of the proposed non-invariance in models. While it is tempting to suggest that problems with replication and generalizability are simply issues with measurement, it is crucial to remember that all models have variability and error, even those models estimating the differences between item functioning, such as multi-group confirmatory factor analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Buchanan, Erin Michelle, 2023. "Visualizing and Interpreting Multi-Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis," OSF Preprints 9hzfe, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:9hzfe
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/9hzfe
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/642752bc91920609dceef468/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/9hzfe?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven Boker & Michael Neale & Hermine Maes & Michael Wilde & Michael Spiegel & Timothy Brick & Jeffrey Spies & Ryne Estabrook & Sarah Kenny & Timothy Bates & Paras Mehta & John Fox, 2011. "OpenMx: An Open Source Extended Structural Equation Modeling Framework," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 306-317, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Epskamp, Sacha & Cramer, Angélique O.J. & Waldorp, Lourens J. & Schmittmann, Verena D. & Borsboom, Denny, 2012. "qgraph: Network Visualizations of Relationships in Psychometric Data," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i04).
    2. Johan Oud & Manuel Voelkle, 2014. "Do missing values exist? Incomplete data handling in cross-national longitudinal studies by means of continuous time modeling," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3271-3288, November.
    3. Ken B Hanscombe & Maciej Trzaskowski & Claire M A Haworth & Oliver S P Davis & Philip S Dale & Robert Plomin, 2012. "Socioeconomic Status (SES) and Children's Intelligence (IQ): In a UK-Representative Sample SES Moderates the Environmental, Not Genetic, Effect on IQ," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Nancy, Jane Y. & Khanna, Nehemiah H. & Arputharaj, Kannan, 2017. "Imputing missing values in unevenly spaced clinical time series data to build an effective temporal classification framework," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 63-79.
    5. D V M Bishop & Mervyn J Hardiman & Johanna G Barry, 2012. "Auditory Deficit as a Consequence Rather than Endophenotype of Specific Language Impairment: Electrophysiological Evidence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-11, May.
    6. Lee, Anthony J. & Hibbs, Courtney & Wright, Margaret J. & Martin, Nicholas G. & Keller, Matthew C. & Zietsch, Brendan P., 2017. "Assessing the accuracy of perceptions of intelligence based on heritable facial features," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 1-8.
    7. Kan, Kees-Jan & van der Maas, Han L.J. & Levine, Stephen Z., 2019. "Extending psychometric network analysis: Empirical evidence against g in favor of mutualism?," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 52-62.
    8. van de Weijer, Margot P. & de Vries, Lianne P. & Pelt, Dirk H.M. & Ligthart, Lannie & Willemsen, Gonneke & Boomsma, Dorret I. & de Geus, Eco & Bartels, Meike, 2022. "Self-rated health when population health is challenged by the COVID-19 pandemic; a longitudinal study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    9. Hao Wu & Michael Neale, 2013. "On the Likelihood Ratio Tests in Bivariate ACDE Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 441-463, July.
    10. Yongliang Deng & Haolun Guo & Miaomiao Meng & Ying Zhang & Shuangshuang Pei, 2020. "Exploring the Effects of Safety Climate on Worker’s Safety Behavior in Subway Operation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    11. Chenggang Wang, 2022. "Green Technology Innovation, Energy Consumption Structure and Sustainable Improvement of Enterprise Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Edgar Merkle & Achim Zeileis, 2013. "Tests of Measurement Invariance Without Subgroups: A Generalization of Classical Methods," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 59-82, January.
    13. Vijaya Sundararajan & Ou Yang & Jongsay Yong, 2023. "Socioeconomic status and access to care in a universal healthcare system: The case of acute myocardial infarction in Australia," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2023n10, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    14. Klaus Holst & Esben Budtz-Jørgensen, 2013. "Linear latent variable models: the lava-package," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 1385-1452, August.
    15. Sy-Miin Chow & Guangjian Zhang, 2013. "Nonlinear Regime-Switching State-Space (RSSS) Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 740-768, October.
    16. Barr, Peter B. & Salvatore, Jessica E. & Maes, Hermine & Aliev, Fazil & Latvala, Antti & Viken, Richard & Rose, Richard J. & Kaprio, Jaakko & Dick, Danielle M., 2016. "Education and alcohol use: A study of gene-environment interaction in young adulthood," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 158-167.
    17. Angelo Moretti & Natalie Shlomo & Joseph W. Sakshaug, 2020. "Multivariate Small Area Estimation of Multidimensional Latent Economic Well‐being Indicators," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(1), pages 1-28, April.
    18. Steven F. Lehrer & Weili Ding, 2017. "Are genetic markers of interest for economic research?," IZA Journal of Labor Policy, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, December.
    19. Chisato Hayashi & Soshiro Ogata & Haruka Tanaka & Kazuo Hayakawa, 2021. "The Differential Heritability of Social Adjustment by Sex," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-15, January.
    20. Jolynn Pek & Hao Wu, 2015. "Profile Likelihood-Based Confidence Intervals and Regions for Structural Equation Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(4), pages 1123-1145, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:9hzfe. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.