IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/marxiv/rzaq5.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Washington Shellfish Aquaculture: Assessment of the Current Regulatory Frameworks

Author

Listed:
  • Evrard, Raye

    (OCTO (Open Communication for The Ocean))

Abstract

The Washington shellfish aquaculture regulatory framework is a complex instrument with numerous permits and high agency involvement. Shellfish business owners, industry officials and policy-­makers look to simplify the overall process by reducing paperwork and permit redundancies. In the past, the Washington aquaculture sector held a close relationship with the Washington Department of Agriculture, and policy-­ makers are again assessing a closer future relationship, aiding in regulatory efficiency. The purpose of this study is to locate sources of inefficiency within the shellfish aquaculture regulatory framework and supply new ideas for future policy-­making based on an aquaculture regulatory framework proposed by Takoukam and Erikstein (2013). There are four main objectives to this study. The first is to identify barriers within the regulatory framework from the federal scale to the county level restricting the Washington shellfish industry. Through scientific and governmental literature reviews, and information from conference attendance, these barriers are identified. The second objective is to showcase current programs addressing regulatory barriers in aquaculture. Current programs are the Shellfish Interagency Permitting Team, the Pacific Aquaculture Caucus, and the Pacific Coast Shellfish Growers Association. The third objective is to compare the regulatory framework for aquaculture based on the Washington agriculture framework. I used the Washington agriculture program as a template to assess how aquaculture can meet the regulatory goals set forth by Takoukam and Erikstein (2013). The Florida Aquaculture program, which is a combined Aquaculture-­Agriculture regulatory department, is used to illustrate a closer relationship between the two divisions. The final objective is to assess the future of Washington aquaculture based on information provided through the first three objectives. Preliminary recommendations for the Washington regulatory framework are to shift regulatory work to county level officials, limit the number of government agencies involved, reduce review periods, and increase regulatory transparency on county and state levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Evrard, Raye, 2018. "Washington Shellfish Aquaculture: Assessment of the Current Regulatory Frameworks," MarXiv rzaq5, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:marxiv:rzaq5
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/rzaq5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5a6a2b753623a3000d6367a1/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/rzaq5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gibbs, Mark T., 2009. "Implementation barriers to establishing a sustainable coastal aquaculture sector," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 83-89, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Teresa R. Johnson & Kate Beard & Damian C. Brady & Carrie J. Byron & Caitlin Cleaver & Kevin Duffy & Nicholas Keeney & Melissa Kimble & Molly Miller & Shane Moeykens & Mario Teisl & G. Peter van Walsu, 2019. "A Social-Ecological System Framework for Marine Aquaculture Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Lavaud, Romain & Ullman, David S. & Venolia, Celeste & Thornber, Carol & Green-Gavrielidis, Lindsay & Humphries, Austin, 2023. "Production potential of seaweed and shellfish integrated aquaculture in Narragansett Bay (Rhode Island, U.S.) using an ecosystem model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 481(C).
    3. Murray, Grant & D’Anna, Linda, 2015. "Seeing shellfish from the seashore: The importance of values and place in perceptions of aquaculture and marine social–ecological system interactions," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 125-133.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:marxiv:rzaq5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://marxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.