IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/opa/wpaper/0041.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Model of a Liberally Conservative Approach to Negotiation in Public Administration

Author

Listed:
  • Dagmar Svobodová

    (Department of Economics and Public Administration, School of Business Administration, Silesian University)

Abstract

The goal of this essay is to suggest a strategy based on Cartesian quadrants which the current liberal-conservative politicians could apply to their decision-making and negotiating with their partners in public administration, in terms of integral approach that is based on the integral theory with AQAL framework. In the review and relevant leterature, the reader is presented with the concept of the liberal-conservative ideology that combines liberalism and conservatism where the liberal-conservative ideology complies with collective form of economy structure of the society. The models and data specification describes research methodology based on a comparison of the four key variables of the integral theory quadrants on the background of different aspects of the Cartesian ideology concept. The analysis and findings attributes and explains the key variables of the current liberal-conservative program of the ODS party to AQAL framework as the outcome of the integral approach of its current management. The conclusion summarizes the benefits of the integral theory as the intersection point of all four key variables of the AQAL framework quadrants for the current liberal conservative ODS members into one group where the negotiations and decision-making only work when being complex on a higher level.

Suggested Citation

  • Dagmar Svobodová, 2017. "A Model of a Liberally Conservative Approach to Negotiation in Public Administration," Working Papers 0041, Silesian University, School of Business Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:opa:wpaper:0041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.iivopf.cz/images/Working_papers/WPIEBRS2017/WPIEBRS_41_Svobodova_D.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2017
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    cartesianism; integral; liberal-conservatism;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H8 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:opa:wpaper:0041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: David Jančar (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/opfslcz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.