IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/stdaaa/2011-5-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measuring the Joint Distribution of Household's Income, Consumption and Wealth Using Nested Atkinson Measures

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Ruiz

    (OECD)

Abstract

Following recommendations from the Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi Commission (2009), this paper proposes the use of a new methodology to measure the joint distribution of households. income, consumption and wealth. Based on a multidimensional extension of the Atkinson generalized mean framework, the paper justifies the application of this methodology based on a set of standard and acknowledged properties, proving that this is the sole methodology satisfying them all simultaneously. The derived multidimensional index has an intuitive structure, which allows evaluating the overall material conditions of households under different perspectives and with varying sensitivity to distributionnal issues. Under its general form, the index encompasses a class of sub-indices that impose various restrictions on its parameters; the paper discusses the extent to which different restrictions on parameters affect the multidimensional assessments of various population groups, and provides some empirical illustrations using those different specifications. The question addressed by the multidimensional measure presented here is whether the joint consideration of household income, consumption and wealth modifies substantially the picture of material living standards of different individuals and groups relative to the one provided by income alone. Based on the dataset used here, the paper provides strong evidence on the importance of such a multidimensional assessment. Dans le prolongement des recommandations de la Commission Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi (2009), cet article propose une nouvelle approche pour la mesure de la distribution jointe du revenu, de la consommation et de la richesse. En se basant sur une extension multidimensionnelle des moyennes généralisées a la Atkinson, l’utilisation d’une telle structure est justifiée sur la base de propriétés standards utilisées dans la cadre de la théorie de la mesure du bien-etre. Il est en outre demontré que la structure sélectionnée est la seule forme possible satisfaisant l’ensemble des propriétés simultanément. Cette nouvelle mesure revêt une structure relativement intuitive permettant d’évaluer le bien-être matériel des ménages selon différentes perspectives et avec une sensibilité ajustable aux inégalités, ce dans les différentes dimensions considérées. Sous sa forme générale, l’index contient en outre une variété de spécifications se traduisant par différentes restrictions paramétriques; l’impact de ces restrictions ainsi que leur signification économique sont discutés, théoriquement et empiriquement. La question centrale adressée par cette nouvelle mesure est ainsi de savoir si l’appréciation jointe du revenu, de la consommation et de la richesse est à même d’altérer significativement la mesure des conditions de vie matérielles des ménages, en comparaison de l’approche standard se focalisant sur le revenu uniquement. Sur la base des données utilisées, ce document conclut sur la pertinence de cette nouvelle approche.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Ruiz, 2011. "Measuring the Joint Distribution of Household's Income, Consumption and Wealth Using Nested Atkinson Measures," OECD Statistics Working Papers 2011/5, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:stdaaa:2011/5-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5k9cr2xxh4nq-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5k9cr2xxh4nq-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5k9cr2xxh4nq-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joanna Osiñska, 2013. "Postawy wzglêdem euro i ich determinanty– przegl¹d badañ i literatury przedmiotu," Working Papers 70, Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics.
    2. Paola Annoni & Manuela Scioni, 2022. "The Unbalance Penalisation Method for Metrics of Social Progress," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 1093-1115, August.
    3. Jonathan D. Fisher & David S. Johnson & Timothy M. Smeeding & Jeffrey P. Thompson, 2022. "Inequality in 3‐D: Income, Consumption, and Wealth," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 68(1), pages 16-42, March.
    4. Rubén Raedo, 2021. "Urban Sustainability Deficits: The Urban Non-Sustainability Index (UNSI) as a Tool for Urban Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-25, November.
    5. Anna Matysiak & Dorota Węziak-Białowolska, 2016. "Country-Specific Conditions for Work and Family Reconciliation: An Attempt at Quantification," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 32(4), pages 475-510, October.
    6. Isabel Z. Martínez, 2021. "Evidence from Unique Swiss Tax Data on the Composition and Joint Distribution of Income and Wealth," NBER Chapters, in: Measuring Distribution and Mobility of Income and Wealth, pages 105-142, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Carlos Guerrero-de-Lizardi, 2015. "An Imperfect Approach for Looking at the Distribution of Financial and Non-Financial Wealth in Mexico 1984-2012," Remef - The Mexican Journal of Economics and Finance, Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas. Remef, September.
    8. Carlos Guerrero de Lizardi, 2015. "An Imperfect Approach for Looking at the Distribution of Financial and Non-Financial Wealth in Mexico 1984-2012," Remef - Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF (The Mexican Journal of Economics and Finance), Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas, IMEF, vol. 10(2), pages 145-158, Julio-Dic.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:stdaaa:2011/5-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.