IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/govaaa/13-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Multi-Level Regulatory Governance: Policies, Institutions and Tools for Regulatory Quality and Policy Coherence

Author

Listed:
  • Delia Rodrigo

    (OECD)

  • Lorenzo Allio

    (OECD)

  • Pedro Andres-Amo

    (OECD)

Abstract

Multi-level regulatory governance is becoming a priority in many OECD countries. High quality regulation at a certain level of government can be compromised by poor regulatory policies and practices at other levels, impacting negatively on the performance of economies and on business and citizens’ activities. The most common problems that affect the relationship between the public and the private sectors are duplication, overlapping responsibility and low quality. These affect public service delivery, citizen’s perception, business services and activities, as well as investment and trade. More positively, following certain principles and good practices for high quality regulation in a coherent way as well as facilitating co-ordination among regulatory institutions at different levels of government can bring improvements to the regulatory system as a whole.

Suggested Citation

  • Delia Rodrigo & Lorenzo Allio & Pedro Andres-Amo, 2009. "Multi-Level Regulatory Governance: Policies, Institutions and Tools for Regulatory Quality and Policy Coherence," OECD Working Papers on Public Governance 13, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:govaaa:13-en
    DOI: 10.1787/224074617147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/224074617147
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/224074617147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alketa Peci & Filipe Sobral, 2011. "Regulatory Impact Assessment: How political and organizational forces influence its diffusion in a developing country," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), pages 204-220, June.
    2. Di Vita Giuseppe, 2015. "Centralization versus Decentralization of Legislative Production and the Effect on Litigation: A Case Study," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 267-291, July.
    3. Dobrolyubova, Elena (Добролюбова, Елена), 2018. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Delegated Powers [Оценка Результативности И Эффективности Переданных Полномочий]," Working Papers 041839, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:govaaa:13-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/teoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.