IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/eduaab/348-en.html

An AI-enhanced granular analysis of Thailand’s mathematics performance

Author

Listed:
  • OECD

Abstract

This paper applies the Collective Intelligence Model for Education (CIME) to Thailand’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2022 mathematics data and assessment materials to generate fine-grained diagnostic evidence for curriculum review and instructional support. The study combines AI-assisted scoring, expert review and psychometric scaling, using bilingual item-facet rubrics, with Thai serving as the operational scoring language. The resulting profiles examine student performance across 12 content topics and 17 cognitive operators. Findings indicate relative strengths in geometry-related content, measurement, estimation, chance and probability, and selected procedural tasks. More demanding areas include formulating situations mathematically, interpreting results in context, recognising functional relationships, and working with algebraic, functional and data-representation content. The analysis also identifies limited gender differences in most areas, alongside substantial variation by economic, social and cultural status. Overall, the paper shows how large-scale assessment data can be translated into competency-oriented evidence for Thailand’s ongoing education reform

Suggested Citation

  • Oecd, 2026. "An AI-enhanced granular analysis of Thailand’s mathematics performance," OECD Education Working Papers 348, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:eduaab:348-en
    DOI: 10.1787/e26ed12c-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/e26ed12c-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/e26ed12c-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:eduaab:348-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.