IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Public Policy and Resource Allocation: Evidence from Firms in OECD Countries

Listed author(s):
  • Dan Andrews


  • Federico Cingano

    (Bank of Italy)

The correlation between a firm’s size and its productivity level varies considerably across OECD countries, suggesting that some countries are more successful at channelling resources to high productivity firms than others. Accordingly, we examine the extent to which regulations affecting product, labour and credit markets influence productivity, via their effect on the efficiency of resource allocation. Our results suggest that there is an economically and statistically robust negative relationship between policy-induced frictions and productivity, though the specific channel depends on the policy considered. In the case of employment protection legislation, product market regulations (including barriers to entry and bankruptcy legislation) and restrictions on foreign direct investment, this is largely traceable to the worsening of allocative efficiency (i.e. a lower correspondence between a firm’s size and its productivity level). By contrast, financial market under-development tends to be associated with a higher fraction of low productivity relative to high productivity firms. Furthermore, stringent regulations are more disruptive to resource allocation in more innovative sectors, though the nature of innovation turns out to be important. Politiques publiques et allocation des ressources : Des preuves provenant des entreprises dans les pays de l'OCDE La corrélation entre la taille d’une entreprise et son niveau de productivité varie considérablement selon les pays de l’OCDE, ce qui suggère que certains pays réussissent mieux à affecter les ressources à des entreprises à forte productivité que d’autres. Par conséquent, nous examinons dans quelle mesure les réglementations affectant les marchés des produits, du travail et du crédit influent sur la productivité, grâce à leur effet sur l’efficacité de l’affectation des ressources. Nos résultats suggèrent qu’il existe une relation économiquement et statistiquement négative robuste entre les frictions induites par la politique et la productivité, même si le canal spécifique dépend de la politique considérée. Dans le cas de la législation sur la protection de l’emploi, de la réglementation des marchés de produits (y compris les barrières à l’entrée et à la législation sur les faillites) et des restrictions à l’investissement direct à l’étranger, c’est en grande partie attribuable à la détérioration de l’efficacité allocative (i.e. une faible correspondance entre la taille de l’entreprise et son niveau de productivité). En revanche, le sous-développement du marché financier tend à être associe à une proportion plus élevée des entreprises à faible productivité par rapport aux entreprises à forte productivité. En outre, les réglementations strictes perturbent plus l’allocation des ressources dans des secteurs plus innovants, bien que la nature de l’innovation s’avère être importante.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by OECD Publishing in its series OECD Economics Department Working Papers with number 996.

in new window

Date of creation: 24 Oct 2012
Handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:996-en
Contact details of provider: Postal:
2 rue Andre Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16

Phone: 33-(0)-1-45 24 82 00
Fax: 33-(0)-1-45 24 85 00
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:996-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.