IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

How to Move Product Market Regulation in New Zealand Back Towards the Frontier

Listed author(s):
  • Paul Conway

    (New Zealand Productivity Commission)

From the mid-1980s, New Zealand was widely considered to be a leader in liberalising product market regulation (PMR). However, the reform of PMR has lost momentum over recent years. Many areas of PMR are still consistent with best practice, but New Zealand is no longer assessed to be at the forefront of regulatory policy making. Although economic geography clearly offers a partial explanation for the relative underperformance of the NZ economy, restrictive policies in some areas are also likely to be constraining growth in GDP per capita. Indeed, it is likely that being small and distant exacerbates the negative impact of restrictive product market policies on New Zealand’s economic performance. This implies a genuine need to shift the regulatory framework back towards the OECD frontier. Ongoing improvements in regulatory governance, minimising the government’s influence in competitive markets and lowering barriers to trade and FDI, including ongoing policy harmonisation and mutual recognition with trading partners where appropriate, would all help in this regard. This Working Paper relates to the 2011 Economic Survey of New Zealand ( Replacer la réglementation des marchés de produits en Nouvelle-Zélande à la pointe des pays de l'OCDE Depuis le milieu des années 80, la Nouvelle-Zélande a été considérée comme le leader dans la libéralisation de la réglementation des marchés de produits (RMP). Cependant, la réforme des RMP s’est essoufflée au cours de ces dernières années. Dans nombre de domaines, les PMR sont encore en phase avec les meilleures pratiques mais la Nouvelle-Zélande n’est plus considérée comme étant à l’avant-garde de la politique de réglementation. Certes, la géographie économique explique en partie la relative sous-performance de l’économie néo-zélandaise, mais des politiques restrictives dans certains domaines sont susceptibles de brider la croissance du PIB par habitant. Le fait d’être un petit pays excentré aggrave probablement l’impact négatif d’une réglementation restrictive des marchés de produits sur la performance économique néo-zélandaise. La Nouvelle-Zélande a donc le plus grand besoin de ramener son cadre réglementaire vers la frontière des pays de l’OCDE. Continuer d’améliorer la gouvernance de la réglementation, réduire autant que possible l’influence de l’État sur les marchés concurrentiels et abaisser les obstacles aux échanges et à l’IDE, notamment par une plus grande harmonisation des politiques et, le cas échéant, par des accords de reconnaissance mutuelle avec les partenaires commerciaux sont autant d’actions qui seraient utiles à cet égard. Ce document se rapporte à l’Étude économique de l’OCDE de la Nouvelle-Zélande 2011 (élande).

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by OECD Publishing in its series OECD Economics Department Working Papers with number 880.

in new window

Date of creation: 13 Jul 2011
Handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:880-en
Contact details of provider: Postal:
2 rue Andre Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16

Phone: 33-(0)-1-45 24 82 00
Fax: 33-(0)-1-45 24 85 00
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:880-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.