IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/ecoaaa/556-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Income Inequality, Poverty and Social Spending in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Randall S. Jones

Abstract

Income inequality and relative poverty among the working-age population in Japan have risen to levels above the OECD average. This trend is partially explained by labour market dualism, with an increasing proportion of non-regular workers who are paid significantly less than regular workers, as well as by other factors, including the ageing of the workforce. Social spending as a share of GDP has been expanding in the context of population ageing, although it remains below the OECD average and the proportion received by low-income households is small. Consequently, the impact of social spending on inequality and poverty is weak compared to other OECD countries and inadequate to offset the deterioration in market income. The scope for increasing social spending is constrained by the fiscal situation. Instead, reversing the upward trend in inequality and poverty requires reforms to reduce labour market dualism and better target social spending on low-income households, particularly single parents. This Working Paper relates to the 2006 OECD Economic Survey of Japan (www.oecd.org/eco/surveys/japan). Inégalité des revenus, pauvreté et dépenses sociales au Japon L’inégalité des revenus et la pauvreté relative parmi la population active ont progressé au Japon jusqu’à des niveaux supérieurs à la moyenne de l’OCDE. Cette évolution s’explique en partie par le dualisme du marché du travail - la proportion croissante de travailleurs non réguliers, qui sont rémunérés sensiblement moins que les travailleurs réguliers - ainsi que par d’autres facteurs comme le vieillissement de la population active. Les dépenses sociales en pourcentage du PIB se sont accrues du fait du vieillissement de la population, mais restent inférieures à la moyenne de l’OCDE, alors que le pourcentage de ces dépenses allant aux ménages à bas revenu est faible. L’incidence des dépenses sociales sur l’inégalité et la pauvreté est donc peu marquée, par rapport à ce qui est le cas dans les autres pays de l’OCDE, et insuffisante pour compenser la dégradation du revenu marchand. Les possibilités d’augmentation des dépenses sociales sont limitées par la situation budgétaire. Pour inverser la tendance à l’aggravation de l’inégalité et de la pauvreté, il faudrait plutôt mettre en oeuvre des réformes visant à réduire le dualisme du marché du travail et à mieux cibler les dépenses sociales sur les ménages à faible revenu, en particulier les pères ou mères célibataires. Ce Document de travail se rapporte à l’Étude économique de l’OCDE du Japon, 2006 (www.oecd.org/eco/etudes/japon).

Suggested Citation

  • Randall S. Jones, 2007. "Income Inequality, Poverty and Social Spending in Japan," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 556, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:556-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/177754708811
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    absolute poverty; coefficient de Gini; distribution des revenus; dualisme du marché du travail; dépenses sociales; employment protection; Gini coefficient; income distribution; income inequality; inégalité des revenus; Japan; Japon; labour market dualism; non-regular workers; pauvreté absolue; pauvreté relative; protection; protection de l'emploi; relative poverty; social spending; travailleurs non réguliers;

    JEL classification:

    • I32 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:556-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/edoecfr.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.