IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Review of the Swedish National Pension Funds

Listed author(s):
  • Clara Severinson


  • Fiona Stewart


Registered author(s):

    This paper provides a review of the Swedish National Pension Funds based on international good practice and OECD guidelines. The paper focuses mainly on the general size and structure of the funds, the investment framework and the governance of the funds. The internal management of the funds appears to be strong, with governance and risk management structures in place that appear to broadly follow OECD guidelines. The report concludes that the AP funds could benefit from having one clear and specific long-term investment objective, set by an independent committee answerable to Parliament, for all the AP funds against which their long-term performance can objectively be measured. The mandate and role of the AP6 fund could also be clarified. The report recommends the implementation of the prudent person rule as restrictive investment regulations are leaving the AP funds with less room to adopt varying investment strategies, and thus takes away some of the potential benefits of competition and diversification from having four different funds. Finally the selection process for the Governing Boards of the funds could be made more transparent and rigorous. Examen des fonds nationaux de pension en Suède On trouvera dans cette note un examen des fonds nationaux de pension en Suede fonde sur les bonnes pratiques menees dans les differents pays et les Lignes directrices de l.OCDE. La note met principalement l.accent sur le montant observe en general et sur la structure des fonds, le cadre des investissements et la gouvernance des fonds. La gestion interne des fonds apparait saine, et il semble que les structures de gouvernance et de gestion du risque qui sont applicables soient conformes dans l.ensemble aux Lignes directrices de l.OCDE. L.etude conclut que les fonds AP gagneraient a se fixer un objectif a long terme d.investissement clair et specifique, determine par une commission independante responsable devant le Parlement, pour tous les fonds AP par rapport auxquels leurs performances a long terme peut etre objectivement mesurees. Le mandat et le role du fonds AP6 pourraient egalement etre clarifies. Cette etude recommande l.application de la regle de prudence, dans la mesure ou des reglementations restrictives en matiere d.investissement laissent peu de marge de manoeuvre aux fonds AP pour faire varier leurs strategies d.investissement et les privent donc des avantages potentiels de la concurrence et de la diversification qui resultent de l.existence de quatre fonds differents. Enfin, le processus de selection des membres des comites directeurs des fonds pourrait etre rendu plus transparent et plus rigoureux.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by OECD Publishing in its series OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions with number 17.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 04 May 2012
    Handle: RePEc:oec:dafaad:17-en
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    2 rue Andre Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16

    Phone: 33-(0)-1-45 24 82 00
    Fax: 33-(0)-1-45 24 85 00
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:dafaad:17-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.