IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Current Status of National Strategies for Financial Education: A Comparative Analysis and Relevant Practices

Listed author(s):
  • Andrea Grifoni


  • Flore-Anne Messy


Registered author(s):

    In both developing and developed economies, the awareness of the importance of financial education led to the development of an increasing number of tailored national strategies for financial education. These frameworks promote a smoother and more sustainable co-operation between interested parties and stakeholders, avoid duplication of resources and allow the development of articulated and tailored roadmaps with measurable and realistic objectives based on dedicated national assessments. The comparative analysis shows how countries overcame a series of challenges such as lack of resources, the identification a leading institution, gathering all stakeholders around common objectives and move efficiently to the operational phase. The experiences analysed in this report provide a global picture of the situation in 2011/12 and a selection of relevant solutions and tools to address these issues in a replicable way. This comparative report should be seen as a background document and as a complement to High-level Principles on National Strategies for Financial Education prepared by the OECD and its International Network on Financial Education (INFE). Statut actuel des stratégies nationales sur l'éducation financière : Analyse comparative et pratiques pertinentes La prise de conscience de l’importance de l’éducation financière a permis la mise en place d’un nombre croissant de stratégies nationales sur l’éducation financière, tant dans les pays en voie de développement que dans les pays développés. Ces structures promeuvent une coopération facilitée et plus durable entre les parties intéressées et les parties prenantes, évitant la duplication de ressources et permettant le développement de feuilles de route plus adaptées et articulées avec des objectifs mesurables et réalistes basés sur des évaluations nationales ciblées. L’analyse comparative qui en est faite montre comment les pays ont surmontés certains défis comme le manque de ressources, l’identification d’une institution coordinatrice, et comment ils ont réussis à réunir l’ensemble des parties prenantes atour d’un objectif commun et sont passés efficacement à la phase opérationnelle. Les expériences analysées dans ce rapport offrent une image globale de la situation 2011-2012 ainsi qu’une sélection d’outils et de solutions pertinentes qui pourront être transposés dans différents contextes nationaux. Ce rapport comparatif doit être considéré comme un document complémentaire aux Principes de haut niveau sur les stratégies nationales pour l’éducation financière, préparés par l’OCDE et son réseau international sur l’éducation financière (INFE).

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by OECD Publishing in its series OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions with number 16.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 20 Apr 2012
    Handle: RePEc:oec:dafaad:16-en
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    2 rue Andre Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16

    Phone: 33-(0)-1-45 24 82 00
    Fax: 33-(0)-1-45 24 85 00
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:dafaad:16-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.