IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/dafaab/33-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Licensing Regulation and the Supervisory Structure of Private Pensions: International Experience and Implications for China

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Wei Hu
  • Fiona Stewart

    (OECD)

Abstract

China currently has a highly diversified structure of pension regulation and supervision. In this paper we first review the legal framework of private pension fund regulation and supervision in other economies, including Australia, Chile, Hong Kong China, Poland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. Then, based on international practices and experiences identified, and taking into account China‘s unique situation, we examine potential ways to improve the current private pension regulatory and supervisory structure in the country. Réglementation des agréments et structure de contrôle des pensions privées : Pratiques à l'échelle internationale et implications pour la Chine La structure actuelle de réglementation et de contrôle des pensions en Chine est très hétérogène. Le présent rapport examine, dans un premier temps, le cadre juridique de la réglementation et du contrôle des pensions privées dans d'autres pays, comme l'Australie, le Chili, Hong Kong-Chine, la Pologne, la Turquie, le Royaume-Uni et les États-Unis. Ensuite, en s'appuyant sur les pratiques recensées à l'échelle internationale et sur la situation particulière de la Chine, il étudie les possibilités d'amélioration de la structure de réglementation et de contrôle des pensions privées actuellement en vigueur dans le pays.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Wei Hu & Fiona Stewart, 2009. "Licensing Regulation and the Supervisory Structure of Private Pensions: International Experience and Implications for China," OECD Working Papers on Insurance and Private Pensions 33, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:dafaab:33-en
    DOI: 10.1787/227280580833
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/227280580833
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/227280580833?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu-Wei Hu & Gregorio Impavido & Xiaohong Li, 2009. "Governance and Fund Management in the Chinese Pension System," IMF Working Papers 2009/246, International Monetary Fund.
    2. Iris Claus & Les Oxley & Yong Cai & Yuan Cheng, 2014. "Pension Reform In China: Challenges And Opportunities," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 636-651, September.
    3. Andrew Watson, 2009. "Social Security for China’s Migrant Workers – Providing for Old Age," Journal of Current Chinese Affairs - China aktuell, Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 38(4), pages 85-115.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    agrément; China; Chine; enterprise annuity; licensing; pension regulation; pensions privées; plans de pensions professionnelles; private pensions; réglementation des pensions; structure de contrôle; supervisory structure;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • I32 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:dafaab:33-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.