IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

A Review of Options for Health and Disability Support Purchasing in New Zealand

Listed author(s):
Registered author(s):

    The introduction of an internal market into New Zealand's publicly financed health system based on a purchaser-provider separation was highly controversial. From four Regional Health Authorities, the purchasing side of the internal market was subsequently reconfigured into a single national purchasing agency, the Health Funding Authority, in 1997. This Working Paper reviews the original rationale for the separation of purchase from provision, discusses the recent experience of the separation in New Zealand and reviews options for the possible evolution of the purchasing function. The options reviewed include vertical integration (ie, the abolition of the purchaser-provider split). It is argued that there are benefits associated with the separation of purchaser and provider, and that, on balance, it was a good thing, although its application to all services was probably inadvisable. However, no one model of purchaser organisation can fulfil all the requirements described by proponents of system change. Health services' purchasers are inescapably in a weak position vis-à-vis their providers. Whichever model of purchasing/planning services is implemented, purchasers will need to develop a new set of relationships with primary care providers, especially general practitioners, since primary care services are important for the functioning of the remainder of the health system. There are currently few incentives on primary care providers to consider the wider implications of their decisions for the rest of the sector and the delivery of primary care is imperfectly coordinated with other services. This paper is a background paper and does not provide policy advice, nor does it propose any particular course of action. The Treasury has chosen to publish it (or make it available) in order to encourage peer comment with a view to ensuring that it is of good quality. The views expressed in the paper is/are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the New Zealand Treasury. The Treasury takes no responsibility for any errors or omissions in, or for the correctness of, the information contained in this paper.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by New Zealand Treasury in its series Treasury Working Paper Series with number 00/20.

    in new window

    Length: 134 pages
    Date of creation: 2000
    Handle: RePEc:nzt:nztwps:00/20
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    New Zealand Treasury, PO Box 3724, Wellington, New Zealand

    Phone: +64-4-472 2733
    Fax: +64-4-473 0982
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Scott, Claudia D., 1994. "Reform of the New Zealand health care system," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(1-2), pages 25-40.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nzt:nztwps:00/20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Web and Publishing Team, The Treasury)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.