IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/new/wpaper/2507.html

The end of laissez-faire in classical-Marxian models of growth and distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Luke Petach

    (Jack C. Massey College of Business, Belmont University, USA)

  • Daniele Tavani

    (Department of Economics, Colorado State University)

Abstract

In this paper, we study a two-class ('capitalists' and 'workers') model of growth, distribution, and employment that brings together some recent literature in the classical-Marxian tradition (Petach and Tavani, 2019; Franke, 2020; Tavani and Petach, 2021; Petach and Tavani, 2022). The central innovation of the model is the treatment of aggregate demand as a positive externality for individual firms. Despite assuming competitive firms, optimizing behavior, and perfect foresight on behalf of both firms and households, we show that laissez-faire involves underutilization of the economy's productive capacity. Moreover, both the long-run labor share of income and workers' share of wealth are higher at full capacity. Thus, fiscal policies aimed at achieving full utilization are unambiguously worker-friendly. For this reason, however, capitalists may oppose fiscal policy aimed at full employment, because such policies reduce the relative standing of the capitalist class in terms of both wealth and income. As such, our model provides a formalization of the argument by Kalecki (1943) regarding the political aspects of full employment. We conclude by responding to some recent criticisms of the aggregate demand externality framework advanced by Gahn (2023).

Suggested Citation

  • Luke Petach & Daniele Tavani, 2025. "The end of laissez-faire in classical-Marxian models of growth and distribution," Working Papers 2507, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:new:wpaper:2507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.economicpolicyresearch.org/econ/2025/NSSR_WP_072025.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2025
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Franklin Serrano & Fabio Freitas, 2017. "The Sraffian supermultiplier as an alternative closure for heterodox growth theory," European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 14(1), pages 70-91, April.
    2. Reiner Franke, 2020. "An attempt at a reconciliation of the Sraffian and Kaleckian views on desired utilization," European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 17(1), pages 61-77, April.
    3. Stefan Ederer & Miriam Rehm, 2020. "Will wealth become more concentrated in Europe? Evidence from a calibrated Post-Keynesian model," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 44(1), pages 55-72.
    4. Luke Petach, 2024. "Assessing the Political Aspects of Full Employment: Evidence from Strikes and Lockouts," Working Papers PKWP2407, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).
    5. Isabella M. Webe & Evan Wasner, 2023. "Sellers’ inflation, profits and conflict: why can large firms hike prices in an emergency?," Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 11(2), pages 183-213, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hein, Eckhard, 2025. "Kaleckian economics after Kalecki: A survey," IPE Working Papers 257/2025, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    2. Petach, Luke & Tavani, Daniele, 2022. "Aggregate demand externalities, income distribution, and wealth inequality," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 433-446.
    3. Osman Berke Duvan, 2025. "Extraordinary Distribution Shock in Extraordinary Times: An Assessment Based on Top Industrial Enterprises in Türkiye," Journal of Research in Economics, Politics & Finance, Ersan ERSOY, vol. 10(3), pages 1008-1032.
    4. Gahn, Santiago José, 2021. "On the adjustment of capacity utilisation to aggregate demand: Revisiting an old Sraffian critique to the Neo-Kaleckian model," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 325-360.
    5. Yusifzada, Tural & Cömert, Hasan & Ahmadov, Vugar, 2025. "A composite approach to nonlinear inflation dynamics in BRICS countries and Türkiye," BOFIT Discussion Papers 5/2025, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    6. Dragan Dživdžanovic, 2025. "Examining cheapflation in Serbia in the 2022-2024 period," Working Papers Bulletin 28, National Bank of Serbia.
    7. Michalis Nikiforos & Simon Grothe & Jan David Weber, 2024. "Markups, profit shares, and cost-push-profit-led inflation," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 33(2), pages 342-362.
    8. José A. Pérez‐Montiel & Carles Manera, 2022. "Is autonomous demand really autonomous in the United States? An asymmetric frequency‐domain Granger causality approach," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 78-92, February.
    9. Campana, Juan Manuel & Emboava Vaz, João & Hein, Eckhard & Jungmann, Benjamin, 2022. "Demand and growth regimes of the BRICs countries," IPE Working Papers 197/2022, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    10. Michalis Nikiforos & Simon Grothe, 2023. "Contractionary Effects of Foreign Price Shocks (and Potentially Expansionary Effects of Inflation)," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_1028, Levy Economics Institute.
    11. Eckhard Hein & Valeria Jimenez, 2022. "The macroeconomic implications of zero growth: a post-Keynesian approach," European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 19(1), pages 41-60, April.
    12. Vallès Codina, Oriol, 2023. "Business cycles, sectoral price stabilization, and climate change mitigation: A model of multi-sector growth in the tradition of the Bielefeld disequilibrium approach," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 636-653.
    13. Michalis Nikiforos & Simon Grothe, 2024. "Markups, Profit Shares, and Cost-Push-Profit-Led Inflation," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_1037, Levy Economics Institute.
    14. Manuel Gonzalo, 2023. "The Indian Growth Acceleration: A Brazilian Demand-led Insight," Millennial Asia, , vol. 14(4), pages 509-534, December.
    15. Davide Romaniello & Antonella Stirati, 2024. "Cost-push and conflict inflation in theory and practice - with a discussion of the Italian case," FMM Working Paper 96-2024, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    16. Roth, Steve, 2021. "Why the Flow of Funds Don’t Explain the Flow of Funds: Sectoral Balances, Balance Sheets, and the Accumulation Fallacy," MPRA Paper 105281, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Allain, Olivier, 2022. "A supermultiplier model with two non-capacity-generating semi-autonomous demand components," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 91-103.
    18. Hein, Eckhard, 2022. "Varieties of demand and growth regimes: Post-Keynesian foundations," IPE Working Papers 196/2022, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    19. Lin, Xiang & Li, Xiaoying, 2025. "A study on anchoring Swedish inflation expectations in times of turbulence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    20. repec:uta:papers:2025-01 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Jakob Kapeller & Franz Scharnreitner, 2025. "A pluralist perspective on input-output modeling: searching for commensurability," ICAE Working Papers 169, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • B12 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Classical (includes Adam Smith)
    • O41 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models
    • E11 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General Aggregative Models - - - Marxian; Sraffian; Kaleckian
    • E12 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General Aggregative Models - - - Keynes; Keynesian; Post-Keynesian; Modern Monetary Theory

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:new:wpaper:2507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Setterfield (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/denewus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.