IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/35960.html

Coasian Stakeholder Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew J. Higgins
  • Peter G. Klein
  • Anita McGahan
  • Rob Wuebker

Abstract

Stakeholder theory asks who is in, who is out, and who gets what. Existing work illuminates important dimensions of firm–stakeholder relationships but does not supply a common, transaction-level rule connecting these questions. We use the Coase theorem to develop such a rule. A Coasian stakeholder is an actor with shutdown power, defined as the de facto capacity, within the relevant time horizon, to prevent, materially delay, or substantially reduce the expected joint value of a focal value-creating transaction. If all such actors are identified and bargaining and enforcement are costless, value-maximizing transactions proceed, although rights and bargaining positions may affect who captures value. When transaction costs are positive, however, identification, bargaining, coalition formation, and enforcement can delay, distort, or suppress those transactions. Across six propositions, we explain how shutdown power is identified and acquired, how complementarity and bargaining conditions shape value capture, how firms reshape stakeholder sets through coalition costs and governance design, and why consolidated opposition can sometimes preserve transactions that fragmented claims would suppress.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew J. Higgins & Peter G. Klein & Anita McGahan & Rob Wuebker, 2026. "Coasian Stakeholder Theory," NBER Working Papers 35960, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35960
    Note: PR
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w35960.pdf
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html. Free access is also available to older working papers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D23 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
    • D86 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Economics of Contract Law
    • L14 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Transactional Relationships; Contracts and Reputation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35960. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.