IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/30200.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dependent Coverage and Parental "Job Lock": Evidence from the Affordable Care Act

Author

Listed:
  • Hannah Bae
  • Katherine Meckel
  • Maggie Shi

Abstract

Coverage for dependents is a standard feature of employer-sponsored insurance. While prior work shows that employees trade off job mobility for their own coverage, less is known about the intra-family spillovers of dependent coverage on parental labor supply. We study this question using a large panel of employer-based insurance claims that links dependent enrollment to a proxy for parental job retention. We use a regression discontinuity design that exploits a sharp change in the duration of dependent eligibility by birth month under the Affordable Care Act. We find that additional dependent insurance eligibility increases both dependent take-up and parental job retention. This “job lock” effect is strongest among parents more likely to be on the margin of a job exit, for families that place higher value on dependent coverage, and employees of firms offering a broader range of insurance options.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannah Bae & Katherine Meckel & Maggie Shi, 2022. "Dependent Coverage and Parental "Job Lock": Evidence from the Affordable Care Act," NBER Working Papers 30200, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:30200
    Note: AG CH EH PE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w30200.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aouad, Marion, 2023. "The intracorrelation of family health insurance and job lock," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H0 - Public Economics - - General
    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:30200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.