IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/28533.html

First-mover Advantage and the Private Value of Public Science

Author

Listed:
  • Ashish Arora
  • Sharon Belenzon
  • Bernardo Dionisi

Abstract

Technical progress increasingly relies on the use of scientific knowledge. But if much of this knowledge is in the public domain, can it be a source of private value? We find that average private returns to using public science are small, especially in crowded technical fields, consistent with the view that the expected profit from an input that others can easily access is low. However, private value is higher when a firm is the first to use science, partly because it can secure broader patents relative to later users. Finally, corporate participation in scientific research is a strong predictor of first use, especially of relevant science. This is consistent with the view that participation in science raises familiarity with relevant scientific advances.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashish Arora & Sharon Belenzon & Bernardo Dionisi, 2021. "First-mover Advantage and the Private Value of Public Science," NBER Working Papers 28533, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:28533
    Note: PR
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w28533.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. René Belderbos & Nazareno Braito & Jian Wang, 2024. "Heterogeneous university research and firm R&D location decisions: research orientation, academic quality, and investment type," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 1959-1989, October.
    2. Jiang, Chun & Li, Shihan & Shen, Qi, 2024. "Science and technology evaluation reform and universities’ innovation performance," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. Nagar, Jay Prakash & Breschi, Stefano & Fosfuri, Andrea, 2024. "ERC science and invention: Does ERC break free from the EU Paradox?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(8).
    4. Wu, Keye & Sun, Jianjun & Wang, Jiajie & Kang, Lele, 2025. "How does science convergence influence technology convergence? Different impacts of science-push and technology-pull," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    5. Lenfle, Sylvain & Le Masson, Pascal, 2025. "Back to the future of industrial research: Early double-impact research at General Electric, AT&T and DuPont (1902–1948)," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    6. Sarah Guillou & Basheer Kalash & Lionel Nesta & Michele Pezzoni & Evens Salies & Marc-Antoine Faure, 2023. "Impact de la nature du financement de la recherche sur ses résultats," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-04026916, HAL.
    7. Shanshan Wang & Hongyan Zhou & Tianyi Zhao, 2024. "Configuration paths to high-value patents: evidence from patents winning the China Patent Awards," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(5), pages 2633-2658, May.
    8. Dai, Xin & Tang, Jie & Yin, Deyun, 2025. "Science and city: Exploring science's contribution to China's urban technological innovation," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    9. Arora, Ashish & Cohen, Wesley & Lee, Honggi & Sebastian, Divya, 2023. "Invention value, inventive capability and the large firm advantage," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital
    • O36 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Open Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:28533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.