IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mse/cesdoc/15091.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L'effet de l'homogamie éducative sur les inégalités : une note méthodologique avec une illustration pour le cas français

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Courtioux

    (EDHEC Business School et Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne)

  • Vincent Lignon

    (CNAF et Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne)

Abstract

Following recent economic literature on the subject, the article estimates the impact of assortative mating and more particularly of educational homogamy on inequality measured by the Gini index of equivalized income. The results show that in the French case, this impact is small. They also show that an education variable has to be detailed enough in order to avoid an under-estimation of educational homogamy. Depending on the method used the impact of educational homogamy on inequality range from 0.8 to 2.5%, i.e. a much lower level than the French tax and benefit system which decreases inequality by almost 16%

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Courtioux & Vincent Lignon, 2015. "L'effet de l'homogamie éducative sur les inégalités : une note méthodologique avec une illustration pour le cas français," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 15091, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    • Handle: RePEc:mse:cesdoc:15091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://mse.univ-paris1.fr/pub/mse/CES2015/15091.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    assortative mating; inequality; education;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution
    • J12 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Marriage; Marital Dissolution; Family Structure
    • I2 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mse:cesdoc:15091. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucie Label (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cenp1fr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.