IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Genere e scelte formative: le "minoranze di genere”


  • Silvia Galeazzi

    () (AlmaLaurea Inter-University Consortium)


The analysis focuses on the various educational choices linked to gender. In particular, we want to give an answer to the question: what are the characteristics of women who choose a field of study with a strong male predominance and, conversely, what the characteristics of men who choose curricula that have always been the realm of women? The main aim, therefore, is to investigate what are the characteristics of males and females that are "against the tide" with respect to their peers, choosing educational paths with a clear majority of women for the former and predominantly male for the latter. The definition "minority gender" is used to refer to the two groups. After defining curricula as "female" or "male" ones, the analysis focuses on the description of the profile of the "minority gender".

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Galeazzi, 2012. "Genere e scelte formative: le "minoranze di genere”," Working Papers 53, AlmaLaurea Inter-University Consortium.
  • Handle: RePEc:laa:wpaper:53

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: First version, 2011
    Download Restriction: no


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. De Paola, Maria & Gioia, Francesca & Scoppa, Vincenzo, 2015. "Are females scared of competing with males? Results from a field experiment," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 117-128.
    2. Andrea Cammelli & Giancarlo Gasperoni, 2015. "XV RAPPORTO ALMALAUREA SUL PROFILO DEI LAUREATI Esiti dell’istruzione universitaria: conoscerli per migliorarla e per orientare le scelte dei giovani," Working Papers 73, AlmaLaurea Inter-University Consortium.
    3. Andrea Cammelli, 2015. "XIV RAPPORTO ALMALAUREA SUL PROFILO DEI LAUREATI Laurearsi in tempi di crisi Come valorizzare gli studi universitari," Working Papers 72, AlmaLaurea Inter-University Consortium.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:laa:wpaper:53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.