IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The implications of "user toolkits for innovation"

Listed author(s):
  • Lars Bo Jeppesen
Registered author(s):

    Leading firms have begun to offer “user toolkits for innovation”. User toolkits are seen as a means to eliminate (costly) iterations of need-related-information between users and producers in the product development process because toolkits allow users to perform need-related aspects of product development themselves (von Hippel, 2001; Thomke and von Hippel, 2002; von Hippel and Katz, 2002 ). In this paper we investigate the implications of increasing opportunities for consumer involvement (OCI) in the product development process. What happens when a firm throws over design tasks to consumers? We explore the issue by looking into the relation between user toolkits and firms’ need to support their consumers. A statistical analysis of the OCI-characteristics of 78 computer games products and the intensity of firm support to these products, shows that the higher the OCI, the more a firm will support its consumers. This finding suggests that a portion of the information costs saved (on a reduced number of information iterations between user and producers) may eventually re-emerge as costs in consumer support. However, what is more important is to determine what the support rates are compensating for. Therefore we proceed to identify a number of important (interrelated) dimensions of the toolkit approach. Apart from the support dimension previously mentioned we find in addition two dimensions that may affect the effectiveness of the toolkit approach: 1) the size of solution space left open to consumers; 2) the pre-existing consumer capabilities for dealing with toolkittechnology. We conclude by suggesting that interactive consumer learning will positively affect the toolkits approach. In a case, we study the importance of consumer-toconsumer interaction as a means of substituting firms support efforts and conclude that facilitation of such interaction can enhance the outcomes of the toolkit approach.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy, Copenhagen Business School in its series IVS/CBS Working Papers with number 2002-09.

    in new window

    Date of creation:
    Handle: RePEc:ivs:iivswp:02-09
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ivs:iivswp:02-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (J. Petur Joensen)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.