IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc123317.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The 2020 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard

Author

Abstract

The main objective of the EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard (the Scoreboard) is to benchmark the performance of EU innovation-driven industries against main global counterparts. The 2020 edition of the Scoreboard analyses the 2500 companies investing the largest sums in R&D in the world in 2019. These companies, with headquarters in 43 countries and more than 800k subsidiaries all over the world, each invested over €34.7 million in R&D for a total of €904.2 billion. A main difference in the presentation of data in this Scoreboard edition regards the new composition of the EU following the departure of the UK on 31 January 2020. Henceforth, in this report, the EU is understood as EU27 (i.e. without the UK) and whenever the UK is included for comparative purposes, it will refer to EU28. The 2020 Scoreboard total R&D is equivalent to approximately 90% of the world’s business-funded R&D. The sample includes 421 companies based in the EU27, accounting for 20.9% of the total R&D in the sample, 775 US companies (38.5%), 309 Japanese companies (12.7%), 536 Chinese (13.1%) and 459 from the rest of the world (14.8%).This report analyses companies' R&D and economic indicators over the past years, focussing on the comparative performance of EU companies with respect to their global counterparts. In 2019, global corporate R&D continued to increase substantially, following the trends of the past years, despite a slowdown in companies’ sales and a decline in profits. This is the tenth consecutive year of R&D increases driven by R&D investments in ICT, Health and Automotive industries. Companies based in the EU27 increased significantly R&D (5.6%) but well below the US (10.8%) and Chinese companies (21%) rates. The impact of the covid-19 crisis is not yet reflected in this edition (2019 data), however, experience demonstrates the important role that R&D plays to tackle major socio-economic issues and to underpin the recovery. Indeed, past Scoreboard editions showed that companies sustaining or increasing R&D investment during previous crisis emerged with greatly improved competitive position in the upturn following the crisis. The Scoreboard results stress the need to step-up the implementation of EU policies aimed at supporting industrial R&D and innovation, especially to support the recovery of the covid-19 crisis and the industrial digital and green transitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicola Grassano & Hector Hernandez & Alexander Tuebke & Sara Amoroso & Mafini Dosso & Aliki Georgakaki & Francesco Pasimeni, 2021. "The 2020 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard," JRC Research Reports JRC123317, Joint Research Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc123317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC123317
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feng, Xiao & Li, Yuyu & Huang, Bo, 2023. "Research on manufacturer's investment strategy and green credit policy for new energy vehicles based on consumers' preferences and technology adoption," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    2. Andreas Reinstaller, 2022. "Kräftiger Anstieg der Innovationsausgaben österreichischer Unternehmen im zweiten Jahr der COVID-19-Pandemie," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 95(3), pages 165-174, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Industrial R&D; top R&D investors; innovation; company performance; economic and innovation performance;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc123317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.