IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/decwpa/2016-05.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Economic Policy Perspective on Online Platforms

Author

Abstract

This report provides an overview of the relevant economic research literature on platforms or multi-sided online markets. It discusses platforms from a regulatory policy angle, including potential market failures in platforms, the extent of self-regulation and possible regulatory responses through existing competition policy, consumer protection and data protection instruments. It covers selected policy issues associated with these platforms including possible sources of bias in search engines and search rankings, data protection and the use of personal data in platforms, and platform liabilities within and beyond the e-commerce directive.

Suggested Citation

  • Bertin Martens, 2016. "An Economic Policy Perspective on Online Platforms," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2016-05, Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:decwpa:2016-05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/economic-policy-perspective-online-platforms?search
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Duch-Brown, Néstor & Rossetti, Fiammetta, 2020. "Digital platforms across the European regional energy markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    2. de Bas, Patrick & Batura, Olga & Yagafarova, Anastasia & van Gorp, Nicolai & Kesler, Reinhold & Laitenberger, Ulrich & Bertschek, Irene & Pichler, Eva, 2017. "Business-to-Business relations in the online platform environment. FWC ENTR/300/PP/2013/FC-WIFO: Final report," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 170570, October.
    3. David López Jiménez & Eduardo Carlos Dittmar & Jenny Patricia Vargas Portillo, 2021. "The Use of Trust Seals in European and Latin American Commercial Transactions," JOItmC, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Maria Lissowska, 2018. "Crowdfunding - zjawisko, problemy, regulacja," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 1, pages 59-86.
    5. Thomas, Tobias & Koch, Philipp & Schwarzbauer, Wolfgang, 2019. "Auf die Verbraucher kommt es an: Ökonomische Überlegungen zur Regulierung digitaler Plattformen," Policy Notes 34, EcoAustria – Institute for Economic Research.
    6. Jullien, Bruno & Pavan, Alessandro & Rysman, Marc, 2021. "Two-sided Markets, Pricing, and Network Effects," CEPR Discussion Papers 16480, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Anderton, Robert & Jarvis, Valerie & Labhard, Vincent & Morgan, Julian, 2020. "Virtually everywhere? Digitalisation and the euro area and EU economies," Occasional Paper Series 244, European Central Bank.
    8. MARTENS Bertin, 2020. "An economic perspective on data and platform market power," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2020-09, Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
    9. Tung, Dao Duy, 2020. "The Strategy of Innovative Development of Cross-Border E-Commerce Platforms in Vietnam," OSF Preprints w2db8, Center for Open Science.
    10. Fukuda, Kayano, 2020. "Science, technology and innovation ecosystem transformation toward society 5.0," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    11. Elitsa R Banalieva & Charles Dhanaraj, 2019. "Internalization theory for the digital economy," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(8), pages 1372-1387, October.
    12. Caccinelli, Chiara & Toledano, Joëlle, 2017. "Assessing Anticompetitive Practices in Two-Sided Markets: A Comparative Analysis of four Antitrust Proceedings against Booking.com," 28th European Regional ITS Conference, Passau 2017 169452, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    multi-sided markets; digital online platforms; market failure; regulation; e-commerce directive; search engines; data protection; intermediary liabilities;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:decwpa:2016-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.