IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/decwpa/2015-03.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Revenue, New Products, and the Evolution of Music Quality since Napster

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Recorded music revenue has fallen sharply since the appearance of the first digital sharing technology (Napster) in 1999. By 2012, it was down by about 70 percent in North America and Europe compared to 1999. Several factors may have contributed to this decline in revenue, including the change from physical CD formats to digital downloading and widespread file sharing. The fall in revenue raises a serious question about the viability of continued investment in new recorded music products, but it is not by itself the only question of interest for public policy. The purpose of copyright is precisely to protect investment in new artwork and give artists and producers a financial incentive to invest in new recordings. If that incentive is no longer strong enough to ensure a steady stream of new high-quality products, there may be a need for policy makers to intervene to reinforce copyright protection in music. From this perspective, the correct barometer for the health of the copyright system is whether creators bring forth valuable new products. The paper investigates the impact of recent technological change - that on may collectively term \digitization" - on the quantity and quality of music products produced in North America and 15 European countries. The number of new works has risen significantly since 2000; but the number of new products is a poor indicator of the value that society derives from music given the skew in sales distributions. Instead, one should take into account the evolution of the quality of new music products as well. The evolution of vintage quality can be inferred from consumption data by year and by vintage. In any given year, older music tends (on average) to sell less due to depreciation. Given data on sales by vintage for multiple calendar years, one can ask whether different vintages sell more or less than others, after accounting for depreciation. Using this approach on fragmentary sales data for the US only, Waldfogel (2012) found that the quality of music in the eyes of US consumers has grown sharply since Napster.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Aguiar & Joel Waldfogel, 2015. "Revenue, New Products, and the Evolution of Music Quality since Napster," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2015-03, Joint Research Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:decwpa:2015-03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/reports-and-technical-documentation/revenue-new-products-and-evolution-music-quality-napster_en
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aguiar, Luis & Waldfogel, Joel, 2016. "Even the losers get lucky sometimes: New products and the evolution of music quality since Napster," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 1-15.
    2. Stefano Comino & Fabio Maria Manenti, 2015. "Intellectual Property and Innovation in Information and Communication Technology (ICT)," JRC Research Reports JRC97541, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Christian Peukert & Imke Reimers, 2018. "Digital Disintermediation and Efficiency in the Market for Ideas," CESifo Working Paper Series 6880, CESifo.
    4. Erickson, Kristofer, 2018. "Can creative firms thrive without copyright? Value generation and capture from private-collective innovation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 699-709.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    recorded music sales; digitization; internet; quality of music;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:decwpa:2015-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.