IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/decwpa/2014-05.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Digitization, Copyright, and the Welfare Effects of Music Trade

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Since the launch of the iTunes Music Store in the US in 2003 and in much of Europe in the following years, music trade has shifted rapidly from physical to digital products, raising the availability of products in di erent countries. Despite substantial growth in availability, the available choice sets of digital music have not fully converged across countries. The territorial fragmentation of the EU copyright management regime and related cross-border transaction costs are often perceived as an obstacle to greater availability. However, other factors such as commercial strategies by music producers may also a ect availability. EU policy makers are now contemplating various possibilities to reduce these cross-border trade costs and improve convergence in music availability across countries. This raises the question of how much bene t these policy measures would create for consumers and producers in Europe and around the world. This study calculates the economic bene ts for consumers and producers from further trade opening or trade cost reductions in digital music. We address this question using comprehensive Nielsen data on digital track sales in the US, Canada, 13 EU Member States, and 2 other European countries (Norway and Switzerland) from 2006 to 2011. We estimate a structural model of music demand which allows us to obtain the consumer surplus for consumers in each destination country as well as the revenue for producers in each origin country. Our model allows us to simulate several scenarios. We rst compare the baseline current situation (the \status quo") with full autarky whereby only local music is available in each country - a big step backwards compared to the status quo. We then compare the status quo with a fully open EU Digital Single Market whereby all European music is available in all EU countries. Finally, we simulate worldwide openness in which all music is available in all countries. We estimate both consumer surplus bene ts and producer revenue e ects for these scenarios. Not surprisingly, the current status quo music trade bene ts consumers everywhere compared to the autarky scenario. Relative to autarky, status quo trade raises aggregate consumer surplus in the 17 countries by about e300 million (a 11.3% increase). Trade also raises producer revenue by e85 million (a 2.8% increase). European consumers bene t more from music trade than North Americans. However, it has large bene ts for American producers but on balance small bene ts to European producers. American producers have a larger market share in Europe that European producers have in the US. Moving from the current status quo to an EU Digital Single Market for music would increase consumer surplus from digital music consumption by 1.8 per cent (e19 million) and music producers'revenue by 1.1 per cent (e10 million). Bene ts vary considerably across Member States. Under worldwide frictionless trade consumers in 15 European countries gain e31 million (a 3% increase) while North American consumers gain e6.5 million (a 0.35% increase). Most of the gains from fully frictionless trade - about two thirds - are accomplished by a European single market. Annual gains from worldwide frictionless trade for producers, compared to autarky, reach 1.9% in Europe and 0.38% in the US. Clearly, the additional gains from moving beyond a European Digital Single Market to a worldwide open market would be small for European producers and consumers. Digital music production and consumption is only a small part of all media markets covered by copyright. We note that the gures presented here represent only a fraction of the potential bene ts from further trade opening in other digital media.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Aguiar & Joel Waldfogel, 2014. "Digitization, Copyright, and the Welfare Effects of Music Trade," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2014-05, Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:decwpa:2014-05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/digitization-copyright-and-welfare-effects-music-trade
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ran Zhuo & Bradley Huffaker & KC Claffy & Shane Greenstein, 2019. "The Impact of the General Data Protection Regulation on Internet Interconnection," NBER Working Papers 26481, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Bourreau, Marc & Doğan, Pınar, 2018. "Gains from digitization: Evidence from gift-giving in music," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 106-122.
    3. Luis Aguiar & Joel Waldfogel, 2018. "Netflix: global hegemon or facilitator of frictionless digital trade?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 42(3), pages 419-445, August.
    4. Abhishek Nagaraj, 2018. "Does Copyright Affect Reuse? Evidence from Google Books and Wikipedia," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(7), pages 3091-3107, July.
    5. Handke, Christian & Girard, Yann & Mattes, Anselm, 2015. "Fördert das Urheberrecht Innovation? Eine empirische Untersuchung," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 16-2015, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    6. BROOCKS Annette & DUCH BROWN Nestor & GOMEZ HERRERA Maria Estrella & MARTENS Bertin, 2020. "Geo-blocking: A literature review and new evidence in online audio-visual services," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2020-01, Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
    7. Anderson, Simon P & Waldfogel, Joel, 2015. "Preference Externalities in Media Markets," CEPR Discussion Papers 10835, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    8. Yuki Takara, 2018. "Do cultural differences affect the trade of cultural goods? A study in trade of music," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 42(3), pages 393-417, August.
    9. Georgios Alaveras & Estrella Gomez Herrera & Bertin Martens, 2015. "Geographic Fragmentation in the EU Market for e-Books: The case of Amazon," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2015-13, Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
    10. Hamelmann, Lisa & Klein, Gordon J., 2017. "Removing geo-blocking: What are the effects on innovation for vertically differentiated goods?," CAWM Discussion Papers 100, University of Münster, Center of Applied Economic Research Münster (CAWM).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    music; digitization; digital media; online markets; downloading; international trade;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:decwpa:2014-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.