IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Licensing and Business Models

  • Onetti Alberto

    ()

    (Department of Economics, University of Insubria, Italy)

  • Verma Sameer

    ()

    (Associate Professor in Information Systems – San Francisco State University – College of Business)

Registered author(s):

    License affects software companies’ business activities. While proprietary software vendors create custom licenses, open source companies have less flexibility. The Open Source Initiative (OSI) defines a list of 72 licenses as open source (“OSI approved”). For a project to follow open source licensing, it has to pick licenses from this set. Logically, we expect that an open source company defines its business model around the license that it selects. Thus, we can assume that business model decisions follow license choice. In our research we find that in some cases open source companies remove these license constraints for business reasons. We observed cases of open source companies moving from one OSI-approved license to another or companies innovating by adding additional terms. In all these cases, the decision of change is based on the license being a poor fit with their business goals. Not all open source companies are entitled to change the license because this option is available only to companies that own intellectual property. If they do not, they can try to reshape their business model, but that remains a suboptimal option. Whether cognizant of it or not, organizations are implicitly choosing a business model when they select a license. Therefore, it is very important to address licensing and business model decisions as one system instead of a disjointed two-step process. For this purpose we introduce (1) an evolutionary model where license selection and business model impact each other and (2) a taxonomy that addresses both licensing and business models. Our approach helps practitioners include revenue considerations in the licensing choice and researchers to more accurately study the antecedents and consequences of license choice.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://eco.uninsubria.it/dipeco/Quaderni/files/QF2008_6.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Department of Economics, University of Insubria in its series Economics and Quantitative Methods with number qf0806.

    as
    in new window

    Length: 45 pages
    Date of creation: Jul 2008
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:ins:quaeco:qf0806
    Contact details of provider: Postal: Via Ravasi 2-21100 Varese
    Web page: http://www.uninsubria.it/uninsubria/facolta/econo.html

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. E. Miglierina & E. Molho, 2003. "Well-posedness and convexity in vector optimization," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 375-385, December.
    2. repec:spr:compst:v:53:y:2001:i:1:p:101-116 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. X. X. Huang, 2001. "Extended and strongly extended well-posedness of set-valued optimization problems," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 101-116, April.
    4. repec:spr:compst:v:66:y:2007:i:3:p:409-418 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. M. Durea, 2007. "Scalarization for pointwise well-posed vectorial problems," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 66(3), pages 409-418, December.
    6. repec:spr:compst:v:58:y:2003:i:3:p:375-385 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ins:quaeco:qf0806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Segreteria Dipartimento)

    The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Segreteria Dipartimento to update the entry or send us the correct address

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.