IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Switching from convergence to divergence in the European Union: A case study

Listed author(s):
  • Grigoris Zarotiadis


    (Aristotle’s University of Thessaloniki)

  • Aristea Gkagka

    (University of Ioannina)

EU member states do not get much from participating in a regional trade agreement and economic integration regime: beside the questionable effects on growth perspectives (€-area grew since 1960 with a gradually smaller rate than the world economy), there is a clear evidence for a profound, unpleasant, structural change regarding convergence. During the first two decades of the period we studied, the coefficient of variation of per capita (p.c.) GDP fell strongly and labour remuneration grew substantially relative to non-labour income. Yet, this picture changed after 1980! The previous trend of closing the gap among the countries reversed completely: in 2005, coefficient of variation grew back to the levels of 1960. At the same time, all previous gains of labour vanished: in the period 1980-2005 real wages lost about 35% against p.c. GDP. A persisting period of continuous divergence emerged after 1980, probably due to permanent, structural developments!

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality in its series Working Papers with number 164.

in new window

Length: 13 pages
Date of creation: 2010
Handle: RePEc:inq:inqwps:ecineq2010-164
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inq:inqwps:ecineq2010-164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Maria Ana Lugo)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.