IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Dividend Decision: A Study of Managers Perceptions

Listed author(s):
  • Bhat Ramesh
  • Pandey I M

In finance literature several theoretical constructs have been proposed to explain the dividend policy of a company. Several empirical studies have been conducted to test these theories. Very few attempts have been made to understand the perceptions and attitudes of managers about the factors they think are important in determining dividend policy. It is with this objective that the present study purports to present the survey results. The study attempts to answer the following questions: 1. What factors do managers consider important in deciding their companies’ dividend policy? 2. Do managers perceive a relationship between their companies’ dividend policy and the value of the share? 3. Do managers consider last year’s dividend policy relevant in deciding the current dividend policy? 4. Do managers think tax status of their shareholders as an important determinant of dividend policy? 5. Do managers use dividend policy as a signal for indicating the company’s future prospects to shareholders? 6. Do managers consider dividend payment merely as a residue? This study used questionnaire to seek answers to above questions. The questionnaire was divided into two parts. Part I focused on determinants which managers consider important (on a seven point scale) in deciding their dividend policy. Part II of the questionnaire was devoted to managers’ views (strong disagreement to strong agreement scale) on different issues which have implications for dividend policy. The questionnaire was sent to the Economic Times 250 top companies and was addressed to finance directors of these companies. This study reveals a number of interesting conclusions. First, it is shown that payment of dividend depends on current and expected earnings as well as the pattern of past dividends. This vindicates Lintner’s findings in U.S.A. about forty years ago. Similar results are reported by Baker et. al. for U.S.A. companies in 1985. It is also pertinent to note that managers of companies in India would like their companies to continuously maintain payment of dividend. They do not consider liquidity to be a significant consideration in dividend policy. Second, managers consider that there s a positive relationship between payment of dividends and share price. However, it is surprising to find that they do not consider the purpose of dividend policy as maintaining or increasing share price. They strongly believe that companies should strive to maintain an uninterrupted record of dividend payments, and they should avoid making changes in dividend policy that might have to be reversed. Third, respondents in our survey do not seem to fully understand the clientele hypothesis. They, of course, do not deny the existence of high-payout clientele. Managers do consider dividend policy as a signaling device. Fourth, managers seem to prefer payment of dividend even if companies have profitable investment opportunities. Thus, they do not provide any support to dividend residual hypothesis. This is in tone with their perception that the dividend must be paid consistently and continuously.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department in its series IIMA Working Papers with number WP1993-02-01_01158.

in new window

Date of creation: 01 Feb 1993
Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp01158
Contact details of provider: Phone: 91 79 2630 7241
Fax: 91 79 2630 6896
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp01158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.