IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iie/wpaper/wp23-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Trade hyperglobalization is dead. Long live...?

Author

Listed:
  • Arvind Subramanian

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

  • Martin Kessler

    (Finance for Development Lab)

  • Emanuele Properzi

    (Finance for Development Lab)

Abstract

This paper examines the evolving landscape of global trade since the global financial crisis. It argues that a new era--characterized by the deglobalization of goods and the slower yet persistent globalization of services--has supplanted the era of hyperglobalization. It posits that the halt in manufacturing's shrinking share in global value added may have mitigated even stronger deglobalization caused by a number of influences such as slowing income convergence, financial deglobalization, and more restrictive trade policies. The paper also documents the end of disruptive North-South trade and highlights a new China puzzle, in which sharp internal trade contraction coexists with surging global export shares. It also reveals a positive correlation between mercantilism and both trade and growth at the global level.

Suggested Citation

  • Arvind Subramanian & Martin Kessler & Emanuele Properzi, 2023. "Trade hyperglobalization is dead. Long live...?," Working Paper Series WP23-11, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:iie:wpaper:wp23-11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.piie.com/publications/working-papers/trade-hyperglobalization-dead-long-live
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Global Value Chains; Globalization; Current Account; China;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F60 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - General
    • F62 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Macroeconomic Impacts
    • F30 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - General
    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:wpaper:wp23-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peterson Institute webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iieeeus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.