Author
Listed:
- Bauer, Bernhard
(Center for Responsible AI Technologies, and University of Augsburg, & Germany)
- Mühlbauer, Sabrina
(Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany)
- Schlögl-Flierl, Kerstin
(Center for Responsible AI Technologies, and University of Augsburg, & Germany)
- Weber, Enzo
(Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany ; University of Regensburg)
- Ziethmann, Paula Franziska
(Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany)
Abstract
"This article addresses the ethical design of artificial intelligence (AI) in the public sector, with a particular focus on Public Employment Services (PES). While AI is increasingly employed to streamline administrative processes and improve service delivery, its application in employment mediation raises fundamental concerns regarding fairness, accountability, and democratic legitimacy. The EU Artificial Intelligence Act has further underscored the urgency of addressing these challenges by classifying employment-related AI systems as high-risk, thereby mandating robust safeguards to prevent discrimination and ensure transparency. The central aim of this study is to examine how ethical and social considerations can be systematically embedded in the development and implementation of public sector AI. Using the German PES as a case study, we introduce the “Embedded Ethics and Social Sciences” approach (EE), which integrates ethical reflection and practitioner involvement from the outset. Qualitative insights from interviews with caseworkers highlight the socio-technical challenges of implementation, particularly the need to reconcile efficiency with citizen trust. Building on these insights, we propose concrete design elements emerging from the integration of ethical and social considerations into system development. In this context, we discuss issues of data ethics and bias, fairness, and the role of explainable AI (XAI). Our analysis demonstrates that this framework not only supports compliance with new regulatory requirements but also strengthens human oversight and agency, and shared decision-making. More broadly, the findings suggest that ethically grounded design can enhance fairness, transparency, and legitimacy across diverse domains of public administration, thereby contributing to more accountable and citizen-centered governance in the digital era." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
Suggested Citation
Bauer, Bernhard & Mühlbauer, Sabrina & Schlögl-Flierl, Kerstin & Weber, Enzo & Ziethmann, Paula Franziska, 2025.
"Ethical Integration in Public Sector AI. The Case of Algorithmic Systems in the Public Employment Service in Germany,"
IAB-Discussion Paper
202512, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
Handle:
RePEc:iab:iabdpa:202512
DOI: 10.48720/IAB.DP.2512
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
JEL classification:
- C49 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Other
- J14 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of the Elderly; Economics of the Handicapped; Non-Labor Market Discrimination
- J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
- J64 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers - - - Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search
- J71 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Discrimination - - - Hiring and Firing
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iab:iabdpa:202512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: IAB, Geschäftsbereich Informationsmanagement und Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iabbbde.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.