IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hpo/wpaper/3_2014.html

Luigi Einaudi: dai Miti e paradossi alle Ipotesi astratte discutendo con Fasiani

Author

Listed:
  • Amedeo Fossati

Abstract

The publication of Fasiani’s Principii di Scienza delle finanze in 1941, originated an important epistemological debate between Einaudi and Fasiani. In fact, Einaudi wrote a review article in his own Rivista di Storia economica, in which he raised some important criticisms. Einaudi’s main criticisms are two: he first one is that in Fasiani’s Principii no value judgments are considered, leading the scholar to an inhuman detachment from his object of study. The second criticism is that public finance is not a matter that could have a plot or unifying doctrine logically deduced from a principle. In this way, one can not write a treatise on the subject, and it makes no sense to write “Principles” of a science which is rebel to unitary and independent accommodation. The Principii of Fasiani, in fact, is not a treaty, but three separate monographs. To these criticisms, Fasiani responded by a letter accompanied by a typescript, to which Einaudi replied by a letter accompanied by a typescript. Fasiani resumed the exchange of ideas with a second letter and a second typescript. The discussion continued by other letters, and with four more Einaudi’s articles and two articles by Fasiani. All the correspondence between Einaudi and Fasiani, which occurred in 1942 and 1943, now preserved in the Einaudi Foundation of Turin, is published in the Appendix.

Suggested Citation

  • Amedeo Fossati, 2014. "Luigi Einaudi: dai Miti e paradossi alle Ipotesi astratte discutendo con Fasiani," STOREPapers 3_2014, Associazione Italiana per la Storia dell'Economia Politica - StorEP.
  • Handle: RePEc:hpo:wpaper:3_2014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.storep.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/3-2014.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • B13 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Wicksellian)
    • B2 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925
    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals
    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • H1 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H2 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hpo:wpaper:3_2014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mario Aldo Cedrini (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aisepea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.